|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
|
I was thinking about adding the Fostex T90A to my Sachiko/Fostex 208 Sigma build, but now I am rethinking that to use a ribbon tweeter instead. I really can not see a down side to this, but maybe I am overlooking something. If I am please inform me before I start this build :-)
The Fountek NeoCd2.0M, a 5" ribbon tweeter which is 98 db efficient. This should be fine with minimal need to damp the tweeter to match the Sigma 208. What do you all think about this? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Looks like we're searching for the same answer.
I like the sound of ribbons but the set back that I've notice is low dispersion characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
|
The dispersion aspect does not bother me. I have owned ribbon speakers in the past and do not mind a sweet spot to deal with. I am usually always seated when I am seriously listening anyway :-)
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Hi Micheal,
I know what you mean. Yes aside from horn tweeters which I have no experience, ribbons sounds the most realistic to me. Always very sweet & clear without sounding hi-fi. Considering the Fountek's surface area, the sound could be overpowering when used in conjuntion with your Sigma's. Might drown out the lows. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
|
I will be crossing over at a very high frequency (approx. 10K) so I do not feel that will be an issue. The extra surface area will hopely just lower the distortion.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Ribbons are often used (Basszilla for instance).
The downside of a ribbon is that its dispersion is wider than a typical horn, so there is more of a dispersion flare at the XO. That said when i use a supertweeter on my FonkenPrimes, half the time it is a set of CSS Ribbons (Aurum Cantus) or a set of Foster horns. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Hi Micheal,
I'm looking at crossing over at 8-10k too but am notsure if this range is correct as I'm building my first wide range 2 way speaker. Any advice ? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
|
What does the shorter ribbon gain you? The frequency length does get shorter as frequency increases, but is it really that important at these frequencies?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
The taller the ribbon, the poorer the vertical dispersion, a uniform dispersion will have a better match to the FR. Also a longer ribbon is usually a trade-off between HF for LF to enable a lower XO.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Horn loaded ribbon tweeter | Mikael Abdellah | Multi-Way | 22 | 5th June 2011 08:58 AM |
| Horn or Ribbon tweeter with fullrange | sharptouch | Full Range | 1 | 12th August 2008 05:01 AM |
| Horn-loading Ribbon Tweeter? | mefistofelez | Multi-Way | 17 | 9th November 2004 08:58 PM |
| Titanium tweeter vs Ribbon tweeter | goldyrathore | Multi-Way | 14 | 17th May 2004 08:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11805 seconds (76.12% PHP - 23.88% MySQL) with 10 queries |