|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Hello,
I seems at least some few does build the Fostex recommended enclosures. I tried a simulation of the F200A using LspCad software and Fostex' proposed enclosure. V=45L, PortLength=140mm, PortDia=80mm Half Space SPL, (No damping material in below simulation). F200A: http://www.fostexinternational.com/d.../pdf/f200a.pdf ![]() I tried captioned Enclosure alignment some year ago and I did actually find the sound somewhat boomy that time. Has anyone here any opinion on Fostex box proposals "generally speaking"..? Or, perhaps I simply did something wrong in my sims.? Can anyone run sims on this driver to see if you get same result as me. Many thanks in advance LageB |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Sorry, something wrong with my links. The SPL chart previous post shows another sim I did (not the Fostex one).
Here under is the SPL chart using Fostex recommended enclosure V=45L, PortLength=140mm, PortDia=80mm ![]() So, another try then. Do I do something wrong in my sims? Can anyone try this element to see if you get same result? Many thanks in advance Edit: FYR here is link to Fostex recommended enclosures-> http://www.fostexinternational.com/d...p/ff_enc.shtml LageB |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
I don't have time to double-check, but it looks about right. FWIW, I'd say the basic alignment is not going to be ideal for music in most situations -flat alignments are usually anything but due to room-gain, at least in most Western rooms. I'd be more inclined toward something like Bob Brines's FTA2000 reverse-taper horn / tapered QW cabinet, a pure TL, sealed box, leaky sealed box / aperiodic / damped vent design with it, or possibly a horn variation.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Thanks Scottmoose and I belive you ar right. I was just curious how the Fostex own alignments simulates. I believe I saw somewhere simulations of some Fostex other element (could not find now). With that Fostex BR it also showed this "bump" in the spl diagram at lower bass prior fading out. As you said, maybe it has something to do with different preferences due to difference Western vs. Japanese rooms...
LageB |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fostex Fe103e blh recommended enclosure frequency response | spacemen12 | Full Range | 5 | 9th June 2008 10:41 PM |
| Fostex recommended FE103 Enclosure | Rega | Full Range | 27 | 12th January 2008 06:59 AM |
| Trouble Reading Blueprints For Fostex Recommended Enclosure | kelticwizard | Multi-Way | 2 | 13th April 2007 03:18 AM |
| Fostex FE108EZ recommended enclosure | hkoetz | Full Range | 3 | 23rd November 2003 11:42 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08869 seconds (72.37% PHP - 27.63% MySQL) with 10 queries |