|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: austin tx
|
After reading the entire BiB and most of the Spawn of Frugal threads, I would like to know the most promising cabinet choice for my smallish room, 12 x 14 x 8 feet.
I have ruled out Hiros as I feel the room is too small. Would a BIB or a Ceinwyn be a better choice? Thanks to all for so much information on these pages!!! Ed |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Hi Mr. Ed, speaking strictly as a newb, I would say it's a tie. I assume you'll want your speakers positioned along the 12' foot wall, which means you can sit far back from them.
The double-mouth horns are often positioned a healthy distance from the wall / side walls, but I have heard them in corners (Harveys) wih heavy toe-in and a very close listening chair, on a concrete slab floor, and they were incredible. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York
|
You will never know which sounds better in your room unless you build them both. That said, whichever you build should work great and will be a great speaker. If you were choosing one of these respected designs vs a ported cabinet for the 168es the choice would be clear... go for the back horn design.
There are lots of excellent choices for full range drivers these days! Be confident whichever you choose the results will be great. Godzilla |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: austin tx
|
I guess I have to agree with RJ,
The BVR's are going to move out into the room were the BIB in the corner will give more distance from the speaker to the listener. I currently have some open baffles but with the small room I have to listen pretty much in near field. This is what I am trying to avoid, as well as let the 168es's do their justice in the best suited enclosure. Ed |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
I am currently testing my 168ES in a Tapered Quarter Wave Pipe. It is actually meant for another driver but the Fostex sounds incredible in the mid and highs, but the bass is not going as deep. It is understandable. I am also on the lookout for a suitable enclosure for smaller rooms.
My suggestion is that if an enclosure of any sort is designed to mount the driver at a slightly upward angle so that the normal listening point is about 15degrees off axis, some of the typical 'shout' of this driver can be avoided, you get a bigger stage even at a close(r) listening position and without fear be able to use Solid State Amplification capable of taut bass and superb resolution.
__________________
Sam |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: austin tx
|
Hi Sam,
It would be a relatively easy thing to put some angle on the supra baffle, I think. Could be worth a try out if some cheep material as an experiment. Thanks for the input! Ed |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Half Chilli and Fostex 168es | dawnpatrol | Full Range | 1 | 14th May 2008 09:42 AM |
| Bipole/dipole cabinets for Fostex FE127E's | jim_vt | Swap Meet | 0 | 10th August 2005 10:41 PM |
| pair of fostex fe127e bass reflex cabinets FS | jim_vt | Swap Meet | 2 | 13th July 2005 01:43 PM |
| Fidelio cabinets with FOSTEX FE 208 Sigma | Jaskier | Full Range | 4 | 16th October 2003 06:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08186 seconds (77.04% PHP - 22.96% MySQL) with 10 queries |