|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I am building the Hframes now for the 18" goldwood (wow is it big!). I plan on using a plate amplifier from Parts Express to power it along with a simple se amp from tubelab for the full range driver.
I will be using one plate amplifier per speaker (one for R , one for L) My question is: if I use one interconnect to each plate amp, am I utilizing only half of its amplifer section? Should I use a Y connector on the interconnect to get my pre amp to drive both sections of the plate amp, or will I drive both sections of the plate amp by just connecting it to one (R) or (L) of the plate amp Thanks, paul |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
What model plate amp?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Some amps will bridge if you use the R only but why not just get Y connectors?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I thought it would look nicer without the Y connector.
It is the 100 W Dayton audio model I thought as I'm using two of them 100 watts would be enough. Also, my SET amp will only put out about 8 watts, albeit on significantly higher sensitivity full range drivers. Paul |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
That amp like most sums the signal to a mono so whether you run one channel in or divide it into two before it sums them shouldn't matter. Me, I like the symmetry of seeing both inputs filled so I would use a Y just because it looks better, not worse.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Hi there Cal: I am constructing a U frame with a 15-inch driver, closley matching a Martin King example (24-inches long, area = 1.3xSd, Qts=.927), and since Martin King has impounded the Mathcadd work sheets, I'm without information on the power needed. I have a 100watts per channel amplifier available and hope to reach 98db at 27Hz (low note on the piano), which will also cover the orchestrial bass instruments at 31hz (Bb). I plan on crossing over at 70hz. Is this a safe and plasuable plan?
T/S parameters supplied with the sub for 8 ohms: Fs=25hz, Qts=0.927, Qms=6.498, Qes=1.081, Vas=6.81cf, Xmax=6.3mm, Le=7.2, Le=2.56, SPL=95db (probabily at 1000Hz), Bl=15.22, 700wrms, Vc is a DVC connected in series for 8 ohms imp. ....regards, Michael |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Hello Michael,
Not wishing to rain on anyone's parade but I'm not sure you're headed in the right direction with that combo. I am thinking it's a small motor driver, not really a subwoofer and to expect 27Hz from it is asking a lot. Also, this is hijacking pforeman's thread so may I suggest you start a new thread and we can deal with it there? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Could you get some pics on how you wire up the h-frames?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A MTMvTMM? & A Open Baffle Question | Ben Reginato | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th October 2006 12:06 PM |
| Open Baffle vs Box Speaker Question | Robert McLean | Full Range | 23 | 24th May 2005 09:54 PM |
| Soundeasy Open Baffle Question | DougL | Multi-Way | 2 | 20th April 2005 12:38 PM |
| Cheapo open baffle XO/EQ question | amt | Parts | 0 | 5th April 2004 11:29 PM |
| Electrostatic HF, Open Baffle LF Question | mrfeedback | Multi-Way | 1 | 21st August 2002 02:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09714 seconds (77.49% PHP - 22.51% MySQL) with 10 queries |