|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
I was wondering if most people do anything about the rising high freq response of full range drivers, or do you live with it finding the cure worse than the problem.
Specifically I want to make open baffle speakers hopefully with as small of baffles as possible with 18 inch H frames for support. Thanks, Paul |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: iowa
|
3 ideas............
1. sit way off axis. 2. use a 10 band equalizer. 3. buy drivers that don't rise (fe167e). We are talking about drivers with a rising response, right ? Similar to a fostex 206e ? Because baffle step is a whole other topic. Open baffles get around the baffle step problem. But a small open baffle without massive eq using expensive drivers is a bad idea to me. Martin J King has a neat design with dual 15 eminence and a full ranger (fostex or lowther). here is a link to a bunch of pics. notable is an alpair 10 OB over an h frame eminence 15" and a 103e over a 15". http://www.quarter-wave.com/Gallery/Gallery.html Damn that alpair 10, I want one. Norman |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Many (but not all) FR units exhibit some form of rising response for a variety of reasons. For e.g. the FE206E starts to lift at about 1.2KHz. There are a few things you can do about that, several of which are noted above.
1/ Most are intended to be listened to off-axis, so that's one. Eq of some form, passive or active, in terms of a shelving filter, is another. 2/A low-mid front horn is a useful option. 3/ A very large (back) horn will attenuate the extreme highs due to the considerable load being placed on the rear of the cone, which the diaphram & motor are not strong enough to overcome. But we're talking very big horns here. Otherwise, back horns are useful only from the chosen low-frequency cutoff Fo (whatever it might be) up to the driver's mass corner frequency Fhm, and can do nothing about any rising output from the driver above this point. You don't want to be running them up higher than about, oh, 300Hz, give or take, or you'll run into problems -output lobing, imaging instability and other the attendant issues. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Nebraska Panhandle
|
Keep in mind that though the response rises on-axis, the larger fullrangers also get increasingly directional. So, if you listen a little of axis, you can achieve a relatively flat in-room balance with many of them. Rooms also tend to absorb a considerable amount of high frequency sound, depending on their furnishings, thus that on-axis rise may help balance things out.
You'll also find that folks prefer very different tonal balances. There are a bunch of traditional high end guys who like speakers with big ol' soft dome tweeters. In a highly furnished room, they'll often roll off pretty hard above 7-10K (check out Stereophile's published "in room response" graphs). Those guys tend to think of anything else as "bright". On the other end of the spectrum, you'll find gents listening to FE206E's (10db on axis rise) in ill suited bass reflex enclosures (no bass) and praising their "detail" and "speed". It sure does sound interesting to have a giant FR rise, but I can't take it for very long. You can assemble a fullrange driver system that has pretty much any frequency balance you want. I tend to like something that trends pretty flat. It depends on the driver, the enclosure, the room and placement. Of course, you'll also find that many/most fullrangers have some peaks in their response that aren't simply part of a rising trend. Different folks also vary in their sensitivity to these. Some find drivers that are quite flat too smooth and boring Others are very sensitive to even small high Q (tall and narrow) peaks. But, I think this is a separate issue from your question about rising frequency response. pj www.wildburroaudio.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
all depends on how the directivity of the driver is. for larger drivers, like the Alpair10 of the CHR70, I would choose to listen off axis, but with a FAST system I built using the small W2-800 I chose to compensate in the filter.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave Disclosure: they were my phase plugs. And if you get a chance to go listen to his system, take your swimsuilt, he lives across the road from the beach ![]()
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Nebraska Panhandle
|
Quote:
Maybe others have opinions more topical for the original question? pj |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Doesn't matter, it illustrated the point well enough. ![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: near Hamburg Germany
|
Hello,
after multi deletes i try it again. "I was wondering if most people do anything about the rising high freq response of full range drivers" make a low mid horn to rise all below 800 Hz and take a sub below 100 Hz here a few examples: ![]() ![]()
__________________
http://www.hm-moreart.de |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Imho most fullrange drivers (6,5" and larger) need some kind of treatment, on open baffle it is no difference, even though you can plan wisely to counter some peaks with your baffle layout.
Rising ones: -sit way off axis and if you have some luck you even avoid (which is not likely) the 3-7KHz harshness most of them have "Flat" ones by spec sheet(even Fe167e): -in 99% they need a notch or two Everything else is imho based on imagination(which is ok, be thankful for that) or sheer luck with your design and selection of driver. Go for filters, it wont hurt. -Micha |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Taming rising frequency response 'naturally'... | Taperwood | Full Range | 31 | 12th May 2006 03:50 AM |
| Freq Response Measurements of PHL drivers | akunec | Multi-Way | 18 | 20th February 2005 01:39 AM |
| Lots of freq response data of PA drivers (link) | Elias | Multi-Way | 0 | 21st December 2004 09:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13212 seconds (86.05% PHP - 13.95% MySQL) with 10 queries |