|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
telstar which is the sensitivity of the fullrangers? does one woofer suffice for bass augmentation? if yes any particular reason about choosing the beyma? as clearly visible i'm in italy too and i have also some trouble finding the eminence or the goldwood drivers, not to talk of the pyles...
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
The estimated sensitivity of the hemps is 94db in my setup. In a small room, under 20sq meters, one 12" is enough, yes. I have searched and evaluated woofers parameters (mostly 12") and as well tried to contain costs being this my first project. The Beymas are excellent drivers. One alternative is the Tone tubbies available in UK at a good price (but still much higher than my woofers). Models up in the Beyma range are also excellent. I have to say that you cannot have very high SPL in the low-bass with a single driver in dipole/u-frame/h-frame. Equalization helps, but up to a point. Over 10db and the sound gets more dirty, I prefer less low-bass to that. For this reason I'm thinking of adding a pair of closed-box subwoofers to cover the first octave. I'm not really sure what you could accomplish with other setups, but it seems to be general consensus to have 2 or 3 woofers per speaker to achieve high SPL at very low frequencies with dipole. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
The subject means that basically the Hempatics project finishes here. I dont see margins of improvements that wont require the replacement of the Hemp drivers themselves, making the name void.
I'll make a new thread when will be the time. I can sum up the balance, though. Plus: +Very low cost +Sound quality like commercial speakers of 5-10 times more the cost +Excellent bass from my POV +Better transparency than ANY speaker I have ever heard, not considering price. (this thanks to direct connection to amps and software crossovers) +Easy, seamless integration between the Beymas and the Hemps, both drivers are recommended, knowing their characteristics. Minus: -Fullrange drivers not particularly undistorted and with an annoying energy storage around 3k which hasnt been easy to tame -Limits in reproduction of high harmonics -Low SPL in the very low bass (under 60hz) -Air/ambience could be improved with speakers with higher freq extension -Wings size a bit too much that creates a little resonance around 250hz (can be fixed cutting the wings). The future steps will be replacing the FR with unconventional widerange midrange transducers (top secret for the moment) + Heil AMT (Mundorf or Precide models) and the addition of a pair of closed-box subwoofers with peerless XXLS 10" to augment the very low bass (up to 50-60hz). And obviously new baffles, with better finish, smaller wings and narrower on the top! The reason for delays is that I'm waiting to get a state of the art DAC that will help me evaluate the new speakers that will come. I can only say that the name will be crazy. Stay tuned. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08512 seconds (77.49% PHP - 22.51% MySQL) with 10 queries |