|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
professional procrastinator
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Everyone,
I have a couple of old ATD Veravox 7, a pretty strange extended-range driver: Qts: 0.57 Fs: 85Hz Mms: 4.3g Xmax: 2.5mm wich kind of enclosure would be better suited for such a *nice* Qt and limited Xmax ?my first thought was: a closed-box or a short [mass loaded] transmission line, but I am still in doubt .. Any suggestions? Thanks, Francesco |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Open baffle
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Open baffle? With a mid Q, high Fs & limited Xmax? Er, not a combination I'd automatically advise, if you'll forgive my pointing it out.
That said, there isn't enough information there to design a box for them, so OB with a supporting woofer might be the best bet. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
professional procrastinator
diyAudio Member
|
Open baffle, imho, is a complex option with a 2.5mm max displacement.
Besides this, I have no info about the Max Input Level for the driver in the frequency domain, but taking into account that the voice coil dia is 25mm, and the whole moving mass is just above 4g for sure it's not very powerful. And yes, it's even true that the design info is close to nothing (my fault) .. I have a dimensional constrain: the baffle should be smaller than 300mm (width) and the complete enclosure should be not taller than 1.3m. Furthermore - it's not a constrain but just a wish - it would be very nice to build a quasi full-range: Veravox7 from 120-150Hz and a woofer for the lower octaves (and choosing it is not trivial, but it's a different issue) OB is a VERY fascinating solution, but I imagine it is not applicable in this case, unless to use the Veravox from 300-400Hz - Linkwitz transform with that driver is out of discussion. Even in this scenario, a single woofer able to cover the 50-300Hz range is not a trivial choice! I never tried RJ, nor aperiodic .. Still doubtful
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
2.5mm xmax shouldnt be an issue either. But not single driver, you will need bass reinforcement. The best thing about OB is that if you dont like it, you can still add the other cabinet walls ![]() I'm about on your same boat because of narrow baffles, i'll need a good woofer to cover 30-200hz (equalized), maybe even a little higher. This means a fast, and high-quality driver of 12" ideally (for me). Look into Volt and Beyma offerings.
__________________
The response of the inner ear extends to at least 200khz - Dr W. Tempest |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
|
I have some of the 7x's sitting right now, but tried them open baffle and thought they sounded superb. I tried a lot of drivers on the same baffles (a good 20" wide), from fostex, smaller lowthers, etc. Great drivers, need to get mine up and running again.
Anyway, due to space, I am thinking of a larger monitor, but have yet to put pencil to paper on it. Enjoy! I was pretty amazed with mine. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
|
One more thing, I did cross them to a sub, around 80 hz, I think. (could be off on that) Just let the driver run and it mated quite well.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| looking for ideas (TO-3 amp design) | kyleaudio | Chip Amps | 11 | 1st February 2008 01:27 PM |
| Design Ideas | kwwitchg | Multi-Way | 0 | 8th February 2005 04:05 AM |
| A better fan design - the search continues | Lisandro_P | Solid State | 53 | 7th December 2004 08:32 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10736 seconds (78.51% PHP - 21.49% MySQL) with 10 queries |