Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th April 2009, 10:07 PM   #11
brookbh is offline brookbh  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
The 125fr and 125wrt are now $50 and $40 at creativesound.ca and have more designs floating around for them now.

Also they sell AC ribbons and their own line of ribbons.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2009, 10:15 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Why is it, I wonder, that people will insist on sticking drivers into boxes that aren't designed for them?

Q on the 103 is far higher than Fostex's claims BTW. The cabinet is also shortly being replaced.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2009, 10:21 PM   #13
G is offline G  United States
diyAudio Member
 
G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Belleville, IL.
Quote:
Originally posted by Scottmoose
Why is it, I wonder, that people will insist on sticking drivers into boxes that aren't designed for them?


Because the driver they were designed for have a limited xmax and therefore are limited as to what kind of music can be played through them?

Quote:
Originally posted by Scottmoose Q on the 103 is far higher than Fostex's claims BTW. The cabinet is also shortly being replaced.
Bigger or smaller?
__________________
Gavin
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2009, 10:40 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
That's because they were specifically designed for a limited range of music. If they don't suit, then I would suggest that a speaker more appropriate to the requirements is in order. Stuffing a different driver into a cabinet designed & voiced for the characteristics of a specific unit (which is not all T/S work, even when published specs owe more to reality than the works of Tolkien) is rarely a good idea.

Same size. FWIW Lotus, with the Mark Audio CHR-70 might suit you better. The driver's 4.5mm travel (one way) and frankly worrying on the VFM scale. Admittedly, the cabinet is a little deeper though -10in rather than 6.5in. It'll take a second driver per enclosure too if you feel so inclined, and need more dynamic headroom.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2009, 02:38 PM   #15
G is offline G  United States
diyAudio Member
 
G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Belleville, IL.
Quote:
Originally posted by Scottmoose
That's because they were specifically designed for a limited range of music. If they don't suit, then I would suggest that a speaker more appropriate to the requirements is in order. Stuffing a different driver into a cabinet designed & voiced for the characteristics of a specific unit (which is not all T/S work, even when published specs owe more to reality than the works of Tolkien) is rarely a good idea.

Same size. FWIW Lotus, with the Mark Audio CHR-70 might suit you better. The driver's 4.5mm travel (one way) and frankly worrying on the VFM scale. Admittedly, the cabinet is a little deeper though -10in rather than 6.5in. It'll take a second driver per enclosure too if you feel so inclined, and need more dynamic headroom.
Hi Scott. I understand what you are saying. I can't use the CHR-70 because it doesn't have the sensitivity that I need with a small SE tube amp.

I guess I will just build a pair of Tabaqs which reportedly work well with the 1320. I do have a question though. If I were to build the Tabaq from 19mm MDF or ply instead of 12mm it will end up elongating the vent by about 7mm. What will that do to the tuning of the cabinet?
__________________
Gavin
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2009, 03:54 PM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
It'll lower it by a couple of Hz; probably not such as to be noticable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2009, 05:58 PM   #17
G is offline G  United States
diyAudio Member
 
G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Belleville, IL.
Quote:
Originally posted by Scottmoose
It'll lower it by a couple of Hz; probably not such as to be noticable.

Thanks Scott. BTW do you have any experience with the RT1C-A ribbon tweeter from HiVi that I mentioned earlier in this thread. I have read numerous times posts saying that the 1320 is a great driver but needs a tweeter crossed over high in order to really shine. I planned on crossing the tweeter over somewhere in the 16KhZ - 18KhZ rainge with either a cap or a second order xover. Do you have a opinion as to where I should start with the crossover and how steep it should be. Also how close to the driver should I mount the tweeter?
__________________
Gavin
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vampyr Cabs for Tang Band W4-1320SJ? G Full Range 6 20th March 2009 10:27 AM
TM design with FR125S + ND16FA Matthew P. Multi-Way 1 28th January 2009 03:48 PM
Peerless XXLS vs. Dayton Reference vs. Dayton Titanic MKIII ? wigginjs Multi-Way 6 3rd March 2008 08:56 PM
Dayton DA aluminum cone woofer + Dayton DC28f tweeter springy101 Multi-Way 7 15th March 2006 05:22 PM
Dayton 6" reference and dayton silk dome tweeter combo project...input? nerd of nerds Multi-Way 4 2nd December 2004 05:36 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Page generated in 0.09361 seconds (74.41% PHP - 25.59% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio