Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th May 2009, 04:58 PM   #21
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisb
approx 3/4" vintage recycled cotton felt ( much softer than fiber glass) - a close material would be automotive upholstery under padding.
wool felt would only need to be about 1/2" thock.

They is a huge range of foam densities, much of it not that useful, and the stuff that is would need to be much thicker than 1/2". I'd think an 1" of fiberglass batting on all 6 sides would be better. Polyfluff batting will also work.

Quote:
Scott or Dave can correct me , but I doubt that much adjusting the wall padding or extra stuffing would compensate enough for the differences I heard between the 3 Fostex drivers in this enclosure (i.e. FF125K, FE126 & FE127)
It won't, purpose of the damping is to try to kill reflections.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2009, 05:12 AM   #22
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: BrisVegas
Quote:
I think that any rear mouth BLH design larger than the Horns, and certainly any of the double mouth forward facing designs of the Scottmoose variety ( BLH or M/BVR) could be problematic in smaller rooms.
It would be nice to some Aiko-like (shorter double-mouth horns) for other drivers (tho I think Aiko will fit me perfectly in the near future...). The taller double-mouth jobbies are just too big for many folks, tho it is unreasonable to expect all designs to suitable for all rooms. Horses for courses. Note to self: Scott, Dave, and Ron have given us plenty of special designs - almost enough to meet most needs. Thanks guys.

Cheers
Raymond
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th May 2009, 06:20 AM   #23
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Raymond - I find the Brynn a great balance of performance, size and ease of build (certainly a picnic compared to the Fonkens). Given enough time and space, I'd like to try the Half Chili for the FE167, just to validate my intuition re the Fonkens.
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brynn... Godzilla Full Range 33 20th June 2009 11:33 AM
BIB for FE126E blasko Full Range 2 31st August 2007 04:23 PM
Help!---which t-nut is for FE126E pwan Full Range 7 11th August 2007 03:34 PM
Yet another Fe126e mod! dfreemansc Full Range 46 29th January 2007 03:54 AM
Here is what I did with my FE126e's audiophile36 Full Range 6 27th October 2006 03:16 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Page generated in 0.07647 seconds (72.64% PHP - 27.36% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio