Mark Audio CHR-70 Application Thread - Page 16 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th April 2009, 01:18 PM   #151
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA,NorthCarolina
italynstylion, thank you for replying to my post. The reason I asked for the cut sheet is because
my Almish woodworker who is going to be building these for me might need it. His children had
to explain that the Lotus v1.0 was a loudspeaker.
I am waiting to hear your listening comments for the v2.0.

  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2009, 02:08 PM   #152
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
v2.0? I haven't done one of those. The design hasn't changed since the initial v0.99 plans were published, nor do I have any plans to make any alterations.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2009, 02:17 PM   #153
tresch is offline tresch  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Click the image to open in full size.


Click the image to open in full size.

Time to plaaaaaay!

I got to tell you, I'm fairly excited to see what the Alpair10 is capable of, if Morpheus is right and all...
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2009, 02:45 PM   #154
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Did someone mention the Alpair 10?

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...37#post1814937
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2009, 02:54 PM   #155
diyAudio Member
 
italynstylion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx.
Quote:

I got to tell you, I'm fairly excited to see what the Alpair10 is capable of, if Morpheus is right and all... [/B]

ROFL....ok Tank. Let us know how the jump program goes.



Scott, when I say V2.0 I'm referring to the modified upper part to eliminate the second void where as the original drawing had the second void on top. It's not really the 2.0 but I'm just trying to convey that it's a bit modified.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2009, 03:30 PM   #156
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Quote:
Originally posted by tresch
Awesome!

I was thinking about doing something just like this, recently, but hadn't thought of the tape idea. Thanks for the pics and everything

for a little extra "torque" on a taped glue joint, you could always try 2" packing tape
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2009, 03:32 PM   #157
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Quote:
Originally posted by Scottmoose
Did someone mention the Alpair 10?

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...37#post1814937

Scott, please stop- there isn't enough time to build all of these (or space to store them)
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2009, 03:34 PM   #158
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA,NorthCarolina
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2009, 03:41 PM   #159
diyAudio Member
 
italynstylion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx.
I'm running out of room as well.....

Any word on how the top end is on those Alpair 10's? I'd imagine that the bottom end is pretty fierce but it's the top end I'm worried about. The FR graph looks a little better than the CHR-70 but that seems counter intuitive.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2009, 03:50 PM   #160
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Well, I'd hate to think you didn't have enough choice...

Top end is clean, gentle roll-off so they're smooth, which personally, I like -makes them easy to listen to for extended periods. The bottom end certainly isn't 'fierce.' Plenty of body for a driver of that size & no need for any correction circuits. Lovely unit, my favourite of its type. Much pricier than the entry-level CHR of course, but it's not an expensive unit for what it does.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
need great smd cap for audio application jsaggio Parts 1 11th September 2007 03:41 AM
CV4014 and 5650 - any audio application of these tubes? cm Tubes / Valves 0 18th January 2007 12:03 PM
Additional application for audio amps... ashok Everything Else 8 17th August 2005 08:20 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2