|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I am playing with a setup that is not a typical speaker arrangement but shows good potential.
I need to come up with a crossover for it but have no clue what type i will need. I put a fr125s, a hivi tweeter and a fe126e in an mtm setup. I have a pair of peavy bass drivers. The tweeters and mids are in an open baffle and the bass drivers would be in vented enclosure built for them. When I first hooked up the drivers I expected the two completely different full range drivers to clash but quite the opposite was true. They seem to almost compliment each other, creating more depth or(thickness) to the sound. Imaging is still razor sharp. I want to filter the bass out of the open baffle drivers and make a matching filter for the tweets. Should each driver be handled individually or should it be designed as a whole. I am very green when it comes to designing crossovers so ANY help is great Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
How will you "handle" your Peavey woofers
Active or passive Passively you may need trafo inductor of 12mH or more, and a bit expencive Active may not cost more |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I was hoping to go passive since the active is very expensive. I thought just a first order xover for the bass to keep it simple for now. I am more confused about the two odd mid range drivers.
A nice active would really be so much simpler but I just don't have that kind of coin. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
As said, to make it work passively you will probably need some big and expencive inductors
I do believe your choice with those 2 different mids could be problematic But you say it sounds nice fore now, but I reckon its when running fullrange you may be facing strange an unexpected behaviour when woofer and tweeter are added Could very well be that the best is to use only Fostex with woofer Or the CSS and Fostex only Whats the sensitivity of the Peavey woofer |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
My intention was to use the fostex with the peavy's and the tweeters. I hooked them up together just for kicks. The fr125 are way less efficient then the fostex so you barely are hearing them but when they are unhooked there is a noticeable difference. Almost like an ambiance affect if that makes sense.
My peavy's are 96.5 dbs. I didn't want to match the two mid ranges together but rather leave them with their individual efficiencies. I only want to have them playing the same frequencies, filtering the same lows from both, but otherwise leaving them to do their thing. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crossover for vifa 2 way setup - how can I find out what this crossover is doing? | Tino | Multi-Way | 11 | 17th May 2009 04:21 AM |
| Will start my new Gainclone from Start, Need Help | samsagaz | Chip Amps | 4 | 27th May 2008 09:39 AM |
| soft start for amp/crossover | jimbo1968 | Chip Amps | 6 | 24th November 2005 07:18 PM |
| looking to start a computer crossover | bser | Digital Source | 3 | 13th November 2005 04:24 AM |
| Can you hear the crossover point of a speaker with a well-designed crossover? | 454Casull | Multi-Way | 11 | 2nd April 2004 05:48 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09520 seconds (77.61% PHP - 22.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |