|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norcross, GA
|
Hi -
Picture a J-Low speaker: http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f6/sma...-j-low-280289/ Now lay it down on its side. Chop off one of the horns, making it a single-horn design. Now make it taller (or wider, if it was still standing up), about 40 inches. Now move the driver up to about 32-36 inches above the floor. You have a "floorsquatter" that is 40 inches tall and about 40 inches wide. The horn mouth exits to the side of the driver. I'm thinking about trying this out. By stretching the width/(now height) of the original design, the single mouth has an area of 1200 sq. in., as compared to the original double-mouth area of 1500 sq. inches. Length and expansion rate remain the same. I will try to keep the compression chamber volume approx. the same. Comments? I'll try to get a drawing uploaded as soon as I draw one. Potential problem areas I see are the driver being so far from the centerline of the horn, and the double-to-single horn conversion. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
FWIW, I recommend maintaining the original J-low's dual mouths, only laying it on its side and 'squeezing' it up to get the driver up high enough between slotted mouths. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Norcross, GA
|
Hi! If I squeeze the entire thing lengthwise, won't I be shortening the length of both horns? I would have to squeeze it nearly in half to get the width down to something manageable. I suppose I could compensate by increasing the depth, but that starts to really eat up floor space.
I've downloaded sections 7 and 8 on BLH design from MJK's website, I might try a fresh design as well. My original thought was that the speakers would have the horn mouths toward the center, with the drivers to the outside, giving me about a 7' spacing between drivers. The entire thing might be built as one unit, in-place. If cabinet vibrations are sufficiently low, I'd use the top as a shelf for my audio gear. If bass output is too high (which I would expect it to be, given the size of my room), I'd store my LPs and/or children in the horn mouths. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
I must be missing something, I don't see why it needs to be any deeper since changing the width/height aspect ratio doesn't appear to change its effective path-length.
Anyway, doing a bit of 'napkin' math, the various measured specs bandied about dictate a ~100 Hz corner frequency, so what little horn loading that's required will mean a large cab if not corner loaded. Bottom line, the specs appear to be far enough off from published to require measuring yours before spending any quality time/$$ on a horn design. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Horizontal or vertical? | dobias | Multi-Way | 7 | 11th August 2009 03:41 PM |
| Horizontal woofers | steve_mak | Multi-Way | 5 | 5th April 2006 11:28 AM |
| Stretched membrane mirror test | I_Forgot | Everything Else | 4 | 3rd June 2005 03:36 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07551 seconds (78.41% PHP - 21.59% MySQL) with 10 queries |