|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tennessee
|
For comparison I have a photo of the 'Jordan with a Ribbon' MLTL, the Alpair 6 MLTL, and the Alpair 10 MLTL prototypes. the Jordan design was built a few years ago while the Alpairs are new ones as reported in this forum.
Jim |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indonesia
|
how does the alpair 6 perform?
im very curious for them, still havent decided either alpair 6 or 5 |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indonesia
|
The Jordan's cabinet looks very very nice.
do u have any plan to combine the Alpair 10 Bass with Alpair 5 or 6 ? |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indonesia
|
is it still possible to put alpair 5 and make the sealed enclosure for them without changin the dimension?
i try to make some drawings, i hope it can be clear |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Jim: Isnīt that port a bit small? Have you found out any port noise?
How much you think the changes of the driver height from the floor will affect the tonal balance of the finished speaker? Nice work indeed anyway... Cheers -Mika |
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indonesia
|
the reason i did this, to have less effect on the T- Lines, which i can be wrong
other consideration since we need separate enclosure, its just for practical purposes to build the cabinet, which this partition create +- 1L any suggestions are very well welcome |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Indonesia
|
rev 1 with outer dimension
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tennessee
|
Thanks to all for the nice comments.
On Henry's drawing I'll agree that the two drivers need to be closer together for a better blend of the sound. Another idea would be to place the Alpair 6 (or maybe A5) in a open tube that on the back of the cabinet. It would be interesting as either a small sealed box or open back 'tweeter'. You have freedom on the crossover point between drivers to 'size' the enclosure for the A6 so that it would be less intrusive into the pipe for the A10. One might choose to crossover high enough so that the baffle step compensation is achieved solely with the A10. This may also tend to reduce the volume needed for the A6. On the port tube size: It is same diameter (2.06") as I used in my Jordan MLTL. I haven't heard any port noise from the recent A10 design nor from the Jordan design for years. I always check the port velocity during the design simulations. Not a worry in my mind. Jim |
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berkel en Rodenrijs
|
nice looking speakers Jim
Quote:
edit: probably not, in scottmoose's design the driver is much more towards the top of the line edit2: I should look at the new threads first, before asking |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jordan JX92S from EAD or Mark Audio Alpair 10? | ilwooz | Full Range | 56 | 20th March 2010 01:26 AM |
| Small MLTL for Mark Audio Alpair 6 Drivers | Jim Griffin | Full Range | 25 | 16th July 2009 01:18 AM |
| Mark Audio Alpair 5/CSS SDX7 DIY | Chris74 | Swap Meet | 4 | 17th February 2009 02:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09922 seconds (81.55% PHP - 18.45% MySQL) with 11 queries |