Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|26th January 2009, 02:40 AM||#1|
Join Date: Aug 2007
BR, TL, or MLTL?
I didn't get a response from the loudspeaker forum, so I figured I'd repost this here...
I've got a bunch of Tang Band 1052SDs that I'm building enclosures for (5.1 HT and music).
I built some MTM test boxes on recommendation from a fellow diyAudio poster (.44cu ft tuned to 50HZ) and I really like the way they sound, though I'd like to get them to extend a little lower (35-40Hz) though it may be a pipe dream.
I drew up some bipole BR enclosures (.93cu ft tuned to 52 HZ), Win ISD shows it as -3db@46HZ as opposed to -3db@70HZ for my current enclosures.
I'd like the enclosures to be ~7Wx7.75Dx48H, I was researching QWPs and realized that the height of my enclosure relates to 1/4 wave @70Hz. though the cross section is way off.
I was wondering how I could build a TQWP or MLTL using something close to these overall dimensions. Maybe a single fold TL?
I'd like to keep the cross section as small as possible, and the overall height under 48" (ease of material cutting).
Here are the specs for the driver:
I'm not too worried about Xmax since I only run them full range for normal music listening (Acoustic, classic rock, classical, blues, etc.) and turn on the sub and 90Hz high pass when I'm going to crank it or watch a movie.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Experimentation with MJK's MLTL||ttan98||Full Range||10||21st February 2008 12:22 AM|
|Mltl-48||keladrin||Full Range||1||23rd October 2007 04:57 PM|
|Is this a TL/MLTL?||Tuliman||Multi-Way||5||15th April 2006 04:38 AM|
|Pictures of GM MLTL-48?||PrimaLuna||Full Range||28||2nd February 2006 11:01 AM|
|Mltl||big_kahunah||Full Range||2||31st August 2005 03:40 AM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|