a bass reflex using two fullrange drivers. A good idea ? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 25th January 2009, 09:51 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default a bass reflex using two fullrange drivers. A good idea ?

Hello,

Afrench manufacturer commercialise a bass reflex box using two full range drivers fostex FE 103 ; one on the front and the other one at the bottom. they claim there is no filter in the box. According to them it's a good and simple solution to add bass to this smal drivers.

they got quite good reviews from the french version of "what hifi" magazine.

It looks like the solution used by the quite critized version of ambience bass reflex cabinet of common sense audio (they use one drivers at the top instead of the bottom)

Here the link (in french) (enceintes avant-scene soprano piano)http://www.ktr-lab.com/index.php?opt...d=80&Itemid=85

They also commercialise this horn using two FE208 sigma per enclosure, also no filter and one driver INSIDE the horn to add bass and have a better balance.

Does somebody on the forum has experienced some kind of enclosures like this (bass reflex) or some horn with an addionnal driver inside (so quite different in this respect to the horns like lowther academy using two drivers ) ?
http://fr.cinenow.com/articles/8795-...-haute-fid-lit
regards Click the image to open in full size. Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2009, 10:03 PM   #2
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
In essence, by downfiring the 2nd driver you are acoustically low passing itm so it is a 1.5 way,

My preference has been to make a bipole, but the way Cal dud it on his calhouns is very appealing.

As done in the BD-pipes it is also good... i am working on a box for 2 FE127 inspired by Bert's design.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2009, 10:33 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Saturnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I'm a huge fan of bipolar designs and can't understand why they aren't more popular. They have so many advantages over monopolar or dipolar designs that it's mind boggling.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2009, 11:25 PM   #4
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Quote:
Originally posted by Saturnus
I'm a huge fan of bipolar designs and can't understand why they aren't more popular. They have so many advantages over monopolar or dipolar designs that it's mind boggling.
That could well be, but then perhaps domestic considerations are at play? Not all of us are fortunate to have complete carte blanche regarding aesthetics / placement of our speakers, or a dedicated room large enough to permit a bipole to fully blossom.
__________________
now on sabbatical
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 06:13 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
so could we state that any bass reflex designed for a full range driver will be improved (in the bass sector) by adding a second driver ?

For exemple, if I take the bass-reflex box recommended by fostex for their FE206, it will have more bass and overall sound better ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 08:02 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Hi hornophile, in my opinion, two drivers in a single bass reflex (or sealed for that matter) is an excellent idea, with a big caveat.

The bass won't be deeper but it may seem a bit so because it will be /correct/. The second driver can easily compensate for baffle step. Then you can integrate a sub very easily in my experience.

There is a tendency to try to bring the sub up to correct for baffle step, and it's unlikely to work (in my opinion). That second driver (facing backward in my cabs) suddenly makes the bass much, much fatter and flatter. No more sag around baffle step. Go ahead and pull those cabs into the room.

Then when you try to integrate the sub, it will be easier to smoothly extend the bass lower. And you won't be mucking it up trying to get the sub to do your baffle step.

If you've ever spent days fidding with the crossover point and level, and never got it to lock in, my guess would be it's because that sag around baffle step was still there, doing its dirty work.

My test is upright bass -- can you hear every note plucked? Every note -- not a single note should disappear.

Regarding why it's not more common, doubling up on drivers is a brute-force solution. There are many more subtle ways of engineering a solution. I use cheap drivers so I just slap the second one on there (don't forget to double cab volume).

Then you face the decision of whether to roll the second driver off, or enjoy basking in the ambience of the rear driver's HF. To roll off, use a single inductor (thank you Bob for that one!) Or just have fun with all the reflections.

Lastly, I'm a newb so ask around before taking my word on anything. I'm basically repeating advice I heard, tried and liked.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 09:14 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
You will not automatically improve anything by adding a second driver (and as noted, you can't just stick another driver in the box -you'll need to double Vb for a start). We're in the realms of differences & preferences; however, done properly, you've certainly a good chance of reaping some substantial rewards. As far as FR drivers are concerned, given that they generally need all the help that they can get in the LF, doubling up on the drivers is only going to be a good thing (providing you design the cabinet / whatever properly). Bipole has its advantages if you like that sort of thing, have sufficient space & a room that will work well with quasi-omni radiation. Alternatively, if you'll be listening primarily in the farfield, having both units on the front baffle & rolling one off above its mass corner (or the baffle-step frequency; whichever you prefer) will also work well. Personally I like the latter, but horses for courses.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 10:18 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Hi Scottmoose, I took the caveman approach and doubled up on actual cabs (a back-to-back pair for left, and another for right). It's very messy but the bass is (semingly) flat -- notes no longer go missing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 11:47 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Simple / brute-force is often the best solution. Look at the Ford GT40. OK, a very fine Lola chassis, but that 7 litre V8 found in the MK2 etc. isn't exactly going to find a place in the Big Book of Engineering Subtlety. All the better for it as well, as Ferrari discovered in short order.

Besides, they're were clever chappies, those cavemen...
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009, 12:11 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
norman bates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: iowa
http://www.dagogo.com/47LabGaincard-OmegaMinuet.html

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/inde...ageID=24436495

I think a dual small driver is an option.

You get double the area for cleaner voice, but vertical sweet spot (on 4" drivers with 5" frames) is about 2" at 12'. If that is not a limiting option.................

Also 2 drivers run wide open do not address baffle step.
My dual 4" with 8" wide baffle gradually wanders away below 800hz when run wide open.

I could run 1 as a baffle step or 1 on the backside for bipole setup....... but at $50 per driver, I think that is a waste of the neo magnet/copper shorting ring/bamboo cone.

I knew the limitations of a dual full range run wide open and worked around them.

I figure if it didn't work out, I could run 1 as baffle step and run a setup like von schweikert vr-6.
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/inde...ageID=24436495

But I run my 12" under my speaker wide open also, that takes care of baffle step and goes way way lower than if I ran 1 of the full rangers as baffle step.

I've been tempted to run the stiffened poly Tang Band w4-1320 because 2 of those tune to 50hz (also near the f3) in a 1ft3 box. And you can get 4 of them for $100 from partsexpress.

Norman
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie Bass Reflex with Seas Drivers downunder555 Multi-Way 13 1st May 2009 11:03 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2