Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th January 2009, 10:33 PM   #31
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Quote:
Originally posted by badman
Hi dave:



Dave, a driver you may wish to play with is the JBL 123A. There are a lot of them around (in varying condition), but it's a lot like a woofer version of the FF85k in some regards. Very extended and smooth bandwidth, large motor but higher Q (in this case, the cone is quite heavy, whereas the 85k loses some of its power via a larger gap to allow the copper).


as might the FF225K be considered?
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2009, 10:47 PM   #32
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
I think the JBL is a 12" and has a much higher Q which makes it more suitabe for OB...

Need to keep our eyes open for some thrashed Centurys with rotting brown foam grills... preferably $20 at a garage sale.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2009, 10:49 PM   #33
badman is offline badman  United States
Custom Title
diyAudio Member
 
badman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunny Tustin, SoCal
One might do so, but there are a goodly number of reasons to keep the 225k as a widerange mid. While it plays well beyond its miniscule Xmax, it is still a level-limited driver. The Qts is very low due to the tiny MMs and huge motor, meaning you'll have a tough time (a big enclosure, backhorn or the like) getting anywhere near the bottom octave. If you're going to cross over at 400, you're better getting a driver that's less optimized as a pure mid or fullranger, and more optimized as a midbass.

Add to that the higher sensitivity (nobody needs 8dB of bafflestep) and it's just not really well suited for this task. The JBL comes in at 90dB and that gives about 3 dB of bafflestep, which is just about right to work with.

None of this is knocking the 225k, it's a spectacular driver that I very much enjoyed my time with, but it's just not a woofer.

Quote:
Originally posted by planet10
I think the JBL is a 12" and has a much higher Q which makes it more suitabe for OB...

Need to keep our eyes open for some thrashed Centurys with rotting brown foam grills... preferably $20 at a garage sale.

dave

I'd say even at the $150 one can expect to pay for just the woofers they're a bargain. I know of no other 12" at any price that's so flexible, between the clean and extended response, deep bass availability, and sound/build quality. If they have extended response on the top end they're usually lighterweight and don't have nearly the bottom end abilities of these monster woofers.
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned!
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2009, 10:51 PM   #34
tinitus is offline tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisb



as might the FF225K be considered?

difficult to design a dipole woofer fore that high sensitivity

But surely nice fore another design
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2009, 11:41 PM   #35
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by badman
I'd say even at the $150 one can expect to pay for just the woofers they're a bargain. I know of no other 12" at any price that's so flexible, between the clean and extended response, deep bass availability, and sound/build quality.
At this point, we'll just wait for a set to find us... our first goal is to do an MJK baffle for which we have the Eminence 15".

As well i have some 20+ 12" Foster woofers, althou not of the same build quality, will have similar Fs & efficiency (by the time i finish with them) and a touch higher Q that need to get used up & essentially cost nothing... HF response stock is smooth up to over 2k (but i'll lose a bit with mods)

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 06:12 AM   #36
diyAudio Member
 
speakrsrfun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto
OK so what I've decided to do is use 4 of the Silver flute 5" per side ( I have 14 laying around) and wire them in 2 pairs paralleled and those pairs in series to get me about 91.5dB +/- and with the FF85K being slightly less efficient I wont have the urge to want to pad the FF85K. I've also opted to run them at 200Hz crossed 6db on the FF85K and second order on the midbasses. I should be good down to the 40's with the four 5" midbasses and in room well below that.

Now my main concern is getting an acceptable baffle width that will support 200hz and below without suck out from the FF85K and still be somewhat W.A.F effective. So I guess what I should be asking is what’s my minimum baffle width allowable for the FF85K OB. I'd love to stay 8 inches wide or less but having little experiences with OB arrangements I'd like some input her if at all possible.

I guess I could do a MMfullrangeMM configuration and leave the back of the FF85K section open at the back, but I worry about reflections off the cabinet, I guess I can guess as much as I want but I have to get down to some serious thinking here, Peace and happy listening.

Speaks
__________________
What was that?... I can't hear you I have a line array filling my ears.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 11:56 AM   #37
tinitus is offline tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
If you think you loose too much sensitivity below 500hz, just ad more SilverFlutes...now you have plenty of them

Its not by the book, I know

Maybe its possible with some kind of power taper with 2 different series inductors
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ff85k.jpg (15.8 KB, 141 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 03:46 PM   #38
chrisb is offline chrisb  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
Quote:
Originally posted by planet10
I think the JBL is a 12" and has a much higher Q which makes it more suitabe for OB...

Need to keep our eyes open for some thrashed Centurys with rotting brown foam grills... preferably $20 at a garage sale.

dave

late to note - brain fart - I must have been thinking LE8T, and of course even at that, the two (LE8T / FF225K) are probably apples and oranges.
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you?
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stereo Lab 400hz 1" horns winslow Swap Meet 14 21st July 2009 10:40 AM
best PURE midrange (400hz-->) thadman Multi-Way 48 12th August 2007 02:35 PM
Gilmore - hows it done? amt Planars & Exotics 12 2nd June 2005 06:12 AM
hows this for linear? Colt45 Tubes / Valves 6 28th September 2002 07:44 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16 AM.

Page generated in 0.12240 seconds (73.59% PHP - 26.41% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio