|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
You're welcome! Correct. When drivers are vertically oriented on the baffle, 'zdriver' is the midpoint between the two so that the different loadings average out. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
If a bipolar layout is used, then 'zdriver' is the center-line for both. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Wound up doing more to get more detail out of them, though of course you can't make a 'silk purse out of a sow's ear', but they were very close to the 125 when it was BW limited to match, so if I'd bothered to add a decent super tweeter, who knows?
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Hi GM
Thanks for everything so far. I have drawn everything up and I am now having the boards cut for the cabinets. I am making the MLTLs and also the BRs. As it is my first build, I am intrigued about the differences/similarities between the two configurations. I am going to do the listening test in situ in the home theater set up and also wanting to do some testing to actually know the frequency response. So, this is also a shout out to fellow DIYers in Melbourne who have the gear and opportunity to do the testing. Please email, thanks |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pa, USA
|
You can use the jordan very sucessfuly in a BLH, probably the same for the AN10. I've tried it with MLTL, but I like the BLH much better, much better base and dynamics. I used Martin king's spreadsheets to design these several years ago.
PJN |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Hi PJN
They look great!! And I am sure they sound great too I don't have access to MJK's Mathcad but I did read his back loaded horn articles and what really struck home was "If done correctly, a hybrid transmission line / back loaded horn enclosure will not require any baffle step correction circuit which is the real big advantage. Imagine 94 to 98 dB SPL, at a 1 m distance for 1 watt of input, over the frequency range 50 Hz to 15-20 kHz produced by a single driver enclosure that is slightly bigger then a commercial tower speaker system." Like many people I want to have a BLH but I dont have the space (height or size of room) to handle a massive cabinet. I am sure there is a BLH (TL hybrid) that I will be building soon |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Front loaded and back loaded horn | DrWoofer.com | Subwoofers | 0 | 3rd August 2007 06:55 PM |
| Back loaded horn design (help please) | Puggie | Full Range | 3 | 23rd February 2006 01:08 PM |
| Back Loaded Horn Bending | Tyimo | Multi-Way | 15 | 17th April 2005 05:04 PM |
| Back Loaded Horn Calculations | Tyimo | Multi-Way | 3 | 15th March 2005 03:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10722 seconds (72.53% PHP - 27.47% MySQL) with 11 queries |