Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd January 2009, 02:01 AM   #11
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Quote:
Originally posted by Antripodean

The tuning down to the 30s is being acheived with the MLTL long only?

The Z driver dimension with 2 drivers..........
Greets!

You're welcome!

Correct.

When drivers are vertically oriented on the baffle, 'zdriver' is the midpoint between the two so that the different loadings average out.

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2009, 02:19 AM   #12
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Quote:
Originally posted by rjbond3rd

I interpreted GM's reference to 30's response to mean he put the CSS FR126S into the RS 40-1354. Let's see what the man himself says but I think Zdriver in a two-driver MLTL is usually the same for both drivers, i.e., the drivers are mounted on different panels at the same height, usually front and back, but I'm interested to hear whether there's a better position for the second driver.
Correct, but I assumed he was referring to the Alpair MLTL in the referenced thread that sims into the 30s.

If a bipolar layout is used, then 'zdriver' is the center-line for both.

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2009, 02:23 AM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Quote:
Originally posted by GM Here's a write-up I did many moons ago. Pic is them during voicing, so unfinished. On a whim, I brought them to a DIY Meet and was pleasantly surprised that they measured within +/- 3 dB from 40-12.5 kHz tuned just by ear...
Yowie, that is a mind-blowing amount of tweakage, GM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2009, 04:45 AM   #14
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Wound up doing more to get more detail out of them, though of course you can't make a 'silk purse out of a sow's ear', but they were very close to the 125 when it was BW limited to match, so if I'd bothered to add a decent super tweeter, who knows?

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2009, 06:42 AM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Default fellow DIYers in Melbourne

Hi GM

Thanks for everything so far. I have drawn everything up and I am now having the boards cut for the cabinets.
I am making the MLTLs and also the BRs. As it is my first build, I am intrigued about the differences/similarities between the two configurations. I am going to do the listening test in situ in the home theater set up and also wanting to do some testing to actually know the frequency response.
So, this is also a shout out to fellow DIYers in Melbourne who have the gear and opportunity to do the testing. Please email, thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2009, 03:02 PM   #16
PJN is offline PJN  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pa, USA
Default Example of BLH with Jordan

You can use the jordan very sucessfuly in a BLH, probably the same for the AN10. I've tried it with MLTL, but I like the BLH much better, much better base and dynamics. I used Martin king's spreadsheets to design these several years ago.

PJN
Attached Images
File Type: jpg jordan blh.jpg (32.0 KB, 673 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2009, 08:03 PM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Hi PJN
They look great!! And I am sure they sound great too
I don't have access to MJK's Mathcad but I did read his back loaded horn articles and what really struck home was "If done correctly, a hybrid transmission line / back loaded horn enclosure will not require
any baffle step correction circuit which is the real big advantage. Imagine 94 to 98 dB SPL, at a 1 m distance for 1 watt of input, over the frequency range 50 Hz to 15-20 kHz produced by a single driver enclosure that is slightly bigger then a commercial tower speaker system."
Like many people I want to have a BLH but I dont have the space (height or size of room) to handle a massive cabinet. I am sure there is a BLH (TL hybrid) that I will be building soon Just need a design to make it happen
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Front loaded and back loaded horn DrWoofer.com Subwoofers 0 3rd August 2007 06:55 PM
Back loaded horn design (help please) Puggie Full Range 3 23rd February 2006 01:08 PM
Back Loaded Horn Bending Tyimo Multi-Way 15 17th April 2005 05:04 PM
Back Loaded Horn Calculations Tyimo Multi-Way 3 15th March 2005 03:34 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16 AM.

Page generated in 0.10722 seconds (72.53% PHP - 27.47% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio