Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th January 2009, 08:05 PM   #11
MJK is offline MJK  United States
Account disabled at member's request
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
I would not have done it that way. But that is just me I guess.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009, 03:02 AM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Bob Brines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
OK, what I am suggesting is that while anything is possible, why do things the hard way. SS is great for bass, tubes are great for the top end. It makes life much more simple to do it that way. There is really nothing to gain by using tube for bass other than proving that it can be done.

Bob
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2009, 07:15 PM   #13
dhieber is offline dhieber  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Illinois
I agree that using an active crossover with a solid state woofer amp on the low pass side has many attractions and I certainly would go that route for a subwoofer.

As a first OB speaker project I was considering something similar to MJK’s passive two-way speaker, but driven by tube amps because those are what I build and enjoy and they are the best amps in my house (IMHO). My thinking was that the Beta 15 would be significantly underdamped with a no feedback tube amp and might work as well as the Alpha 15 with a feedback (high damping factor) amp. I understand how to calculate the effect of added series resistance on Qts, but in the absence of simulation tools such as MJK’s worksheets I was seeking guidance from actual experience. It seems Nelson is the only poster who has actually tried this driver in OB. For simulation, I suppose I can use Edge together with the driver’s infinite baffle response (adjusted for series resistance) to approximate the OB response.

If I were to actively crossover, I would prefer not to mix solid state and tube power amps for crossovers in the midrange (300 – 400 Hz). Of course, I might like it if I tried it, and I do have some unbuilt gainclone kits sitting on my shelf.

BTW, I attended VSAC 2008 and I thought the sound in the Lowther of America room was quite good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2009, 01:23 AM   #14
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by Bob Brines
SS is great for bass, tubes are great for the top end.
This is a generalization... the best amp we have in the bass has tubes. It is limited to 3.2 W thou, so it is only best with efficient speakers. For the innefficient ones i bi-amp with a 150w dual mono Mosfet amp.

That tube amps can't do bass is largely a consequence of SE amps (SS ones have trouble with bass too) and a predominance of PP amps that hark back to vintage amps.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2009, 03:44 AM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin
Quote:
Originally posted by dhieber
I agree that using an active crossover with a solid state woofer amp on the low pass side has many attractions and I certainly would go that route for a subwoofer.

As a first OB speaker project I was considering something similar to MJK’s passive two-way speaker, but driven by tube amps because those are what I build and enjoy and they are the best amps in my house (IMHO). My thinking was that the Beta 15 would be significantly underdamped with a no feedback tube amp and might work as well as the Alpha 15 with a feedback (high damping factor) amp. I understand how to calculate the effect of added series resistance on Qts, but in the absence of simulation tools such as MJK’s worksheets I was seeking guidance from actual experience. It seems Nelson is the only poster who has actually tried this driver in OB. For simulation, I suppose I can use Edge together with the driver’s infinite baffle response (adjusted for series resistance) to approximate the OB response.

If I were to actively crossover, I would prefer not to mix solid state and tube power amps for crossovers in the midrange (300 – 400 Hz). Of course, I might like it if I tried it, and I do have some unbuilt gainclone kits sitting on my shelf.

BTW, I attended VSAC 2008 and I thought the sound in the Lowther of America room was quite good.
You might try basta. It can simulate both the baffle effects for an OB and can add series resistance.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fast action opportunity. Award winning P-P 845 tube amps for sale rcavictim Swap Meet 1 20th February 2006 03:40 PM
how to model fast high frequency op-amps zilog Class D 0 28th November 2005 03:53 PM
Need help with tube test data - fast HugoR Tubes / Valves 15 7th November 2005 09:24 PM
Fast 6.5" woofer advise claudio Multi-Way 10 3rd April 2002 07:13 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15 AM.

Page generated in 0.11281 seconds (69.75% PHP - 30.25% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio