|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
Have been pondering what if any ill effects arise from having the panel directly behind the drive unit in a BiB so close to the driver.
Would it be possible to make a chamber behind the driver to reduce the intensity of reflections with the taper exiting above and below without stuffing up the performance? (assuming that you put a corresponding hump in the rear of the cabinet if you're using a folded taper so that the cross section remains constant. Is this effectively any different to placing a spacer panel on the front of the cabinet to move the drive unit forward anyhow, or does the whole BiB thing rely on a smooth taper in the line with as few interruptions as possible? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
The latter, if it's to remain a BIB anyway. It's a pipe horn. Generally, a little damping is placed behind the driver anyway, which prevents any issues with early reflections. Nothing to stop you making a version with a low pass filter chamber of course.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.05900 seconds (64.54% PHP - 35.46% MySQL) with 9 queries |