Rats - does everyone else already know that if you "Preview Post" and then use the browser back button, you lose everything you typed!?
So, here I go again. I posted a couple of shots of my newly built Curvey Harveys on other threads (FR vs Studio monitors and VanIsle diyFEST) and there was some interest, so here are a few more. If anyone is interested, I will post some build photos and remarks as well.
I'll put the photos in separate posts, since I don't want to hassle with a web photo-hosting service.
Construction: Russian birch ply for the sides; "Rubberply" for the curved faces (Rubberply seems to be made with a multiply-scored wood - Lauan or similar - veneer on each side of a rubber-like centre veneer), faced with paper-backed birch veneer; and walnut trim, solid except for the p-b veneer in the cutouts.
Regards.
Aengus
So, here I go again. I posted a couple of shots of my newly built Curvey Harveys on other threads (FR vs Studio monitors and VanIsle diyFEST) and there was some interest, so here are a few more. If anyone is interested, I will post some build photos and remarks as well.
I'll put the photos in separate posts, since I don't want to hassle with a web photo-hosting service.
Construction: Russian birch ply for the sides; "Rubberply" for the curved faces (Rubberply seems to be made with a multiply-scored wood - Lauan or similar - veneer on each side of a rubber-like centre veneer), faced with paper-backed birch veneer; and walnut trim, solid except for the p-b veneer in the cutouts.
Regards.
Aengus
Attachments
don't feel shy, post big pictures
We run up against my ineptitude with Photoshop. If I make the image sizes more or less the right number of pixels to just scrape under the size limit, the file size seems to grow when I do a "save as jpeg"; so I've been playing it safe and making them around 89K size.
I'll try for some larger ones later, though with trepidation - the clearer shots will show the level of my craftsmanship far too clearly.
Here's another small one to be going on with.
Attachments
OK, the last one was "bigger" - just lower resolution. The others are all 200 pixels/inch, so you can drag them into a photo viewer and make them bigger if that's of any help.
Also, Dave (Planet10) will be getting some higher-res shots so he may post a few on the Spawn website.
Also, Dave (Planet10) will be getting some higher-res shots so he may post a few on the Spawn website.
Attachments
Nordic asks:
Hi Nordic
I'm not really ready to answer that question yet, for several reasons. One is that I haven't been able to do much critical listening (work, visiting relatives, domestic duties); the drivers aren't fully broken-in; the listening I have done says I've got to do more stuffing or otherwise taming the rear chamber - there's a peakiness to it that is irritating esp. on female vocals, e.g. Joni Mitchell on the "Blue" album is v. shrill; and I haven't played with placement much at all. Fortunately, they are far from side walls, so my initial impression is that placement isn't going to be a huge issue. There's also the fact that my ears are far from golden, more towards the tin end of that spectrum really.
All of that having been said, here are my initial impressions. Apart from the peakiness already mentioned, they seem quite well balanced. The bass is not the ultimate in weight and slam, but is tuneful and articulate. I was listening to the Herb Ellis/Red Mitchell album "Doggin' It" and Red's bass melody bits were rendered really well - though the bass seemed a bit smaller than life.
I personally am not considering a sub. It doesn't make sense to me to have speakers this size and still add one, plus the difficulty of integrating it. If you need weight and slam, these might not be the right speakers - but I'm holding my judgement until I get the balance, etc., right.
Hope this helps.
Regards.
Graphs and curves aside, what is the frequency band this speaker can operate in? How does it sound? Need a sub?
Hi Nordic
I'm not really ready to answer that question yet, for several reasons. One is that I haven't been able to do much critical listening (work, visiting relatives, domestic duties); the drivers aren't fully broken-in; the listening I have done says I've got to do more stuffing or otherwise taming the rear chamber - there's a peakiness to it that is irritating esp. on female vocals, e.g. Joni Mitchell on the "Blue" album is v. shrill; and I haven't played with placement much at all. Fortunately, they are far from side walls, so my initial impression is that placement isn't going to be a huge issue. There's also the fact that my ears are far from golden, more towards the tin end of that spectrum really.
All of that having been said, here are my initial impressions. Apart from the peakiness already mentioned, they seem quite well balanced. The bass is not the ultimate in weight and slam, but is tuneful and articulate. I was listening to the Herb Ellis/Red Mitchell album "Doggin' It" and Red's bass melody bits were rendered really well - though the bass seemed a bit smaller than life.
I personally am not considering a sub. It doesn't make sense to me to have speakers this size and still add one, plus the difficulty of integrating it. If you need weight and slam, these might not be the right speakers - but I'm holding my judgement until I get the balance, etc., right.
Hope this helps.
Regards.
Aengus said:We run up against my ineptitude with Photoshop. If I make the image sizes more or less the right number of pixels to just scrape under the size limit, the file size seems to grow when I do a "save as jpeg"; so I've been playing it safe and making them around 89K size.
You need to "save for web". Set the quality to about 30. Just saving as a jpg attaches a lot of meta data to the file that explodes its size. All jpgs loose a fixed dpi when you save them.
a max of about 750 pixels is appropriate for posting on the forum (to make easy viewing for most people)
dave
Nordic said:Graphs and curves aside, what is the frequency band this speaker can operate in? How does it sound? Need a sub?
Based on what Scottmoose has reported and personal experience i would estimate 40 Hz to 15k. Aengus is bringing these up to the diyFEST, i might be able to get an in-room FR of them.
dave
You need to "save for web". Set the quality to about 30. Just saving as a jpg attaches a lot of meta data to the file that explodes its size. All jpgs loose a fixed dpi when you save them.
I'll try that. Thanks, Dave.
...might be able to get an in-room FR
That would be great.
Nice job Aengus
Thank you.
Regards.
Aengus
Aengus said:
the clearer shots will show the level of my craftsmanship far too clearly.
You are too modest, these are museum quality as far as I can tell.
gychang
Gychang
Thank you - but it is only because I have carefully shown their best sides. When I take them to the Vancouver Island diyFEST, I will have to make attendees sign a non-disclosure agreement before I show them.
I'm pretty pleased with them, but Chrisb I know will have a quizzical look on his face when he sees them.
But I'm glad that they elicit such positive responses, even if I have stacked the deck in photographing the best bits.
Regards.
Aengus
Thank you - but it is only because I have carefully shown their best sides. When I take them to the Vancouver Island diyFEST, I will have to make attendees sign a non-disclosure agreement before I show them.
I'm pretty pleased with them, but Chrisb I know will have a quizzical look on his face when he sees them.
But I'm glad that they elicit such positive responses, even if I have stacked the deck in photographing the best bits.
Regards.
Aengus
That is very nice work indeed.
It just goes to show that with a bit of imagination the Harvey (and other Spawns) can be made into a thing of beauty.
You should be very proud.
Do you have any drawings to show how you adapted the original BVR design?
Large photos are very simply included with the text if you open a photo web site like Flikr or photobucket and use the IMG function. I managed to do this in about five minutes initially. Like this:
FE127 in MLTLs:
It just goes to show that with a bit of imagination the Harvey (and other Spawns) can be made into a thing of beauty.
You should be very proud.
Do you have any drawings to show how you adapted the original BVR design?
Large photos are very simply included with the text if you open a photo web site like Flikr or photobucket and use the IMG function. I managed to do this in about five minutes initially. Like this:
FE127 in MLTLs:
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
dublin78 said:That is very nice work indeed.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
this is my kind of crown molding...
gychang
Finally got some time...
...to get photos together. So, if anyone is still interested, here are some build photos (more to follow).
I drew the outer curve by laying out the original plan full size on a piece of MDF as big as half a side, then bending a batten to give a fair curve lying as close as possible to the original points.
Batten clamped in place:
...to get photos together. So, if anyone is still interested, here are some build photos (more to follow).
I drew the outer curve by laying out the original plan full size on a piece of MDF as big as half a side, then bending a batten to give a fair curve lying as close as possible to the original points.
Batten clamped in place:
Attachments
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Full Range
- Curved Harveys