
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
27th June 2008, 01:19 AM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maine

16 ohm vs 8 ohm
I asked fullrangespeakers (formerly AER) if they could make a 32 ohm fullrange driver to help balance its output better with lowerefficiency bass drivers in an open baffle. They replied that it is the opposite of what I think. My MD2B 16 ohm is a full 10db more efficient than their 8ohm unit. They claim their 8ohm unit is 89 db.
I don't understand this. Doesn't a 16ohm coil grab half the power from an amp that an 8ohm does? Wouldn't the 8ohm be alot louder as a result? The reason for all this is that I'm looking for a less efficient FR driver without using a resistor to make it so. I already run two Pyle PPA15s (Qt .65) per side parallel with the 16ohm FS driver (Qt .75) also in parallel for 3.2 system impedance and I get good bass but still a little too lean. My goal was that if I could have the bass drivers at 4ohm and the fullrange driver at 16 surely plenty of power would go to the bass drivers; enough to make up for their lower sensitivity and open baffle losses...but it appears the fullrange driver is still too loud. I don't want to use a resistor for signal purity. If they claim the 8ohm is 10db less efficient but halving the impedance pulls twice the power what have I accomplished? 
27th June 2008, 01:35 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member

Efficiency is a measure of how much power goes into the device as compared to how much useful power you get out.
The efficiency doesn't have anything to do with the resistance of the speaker coil. The efficiency is the output divided by the input. Since an 8ohm speaker has more power going through it than a 16ohm, it will be louder than a 16ohm (and it will need twice the power rating!). So the 16ohms are probably more efficient simply because of their construction, but it will not make them louder unless you are listening at the same input level as the 8ohms. I don't know how much 10db affects the volume, as I haven't gotten into this area of study yet. However, I think the 8ohms will still be louder. Also, I'm sure you know that the lower efficiency means that you have to put more power into the cone to make it move  indicating that (theoretically) the material keeping the cone in place will cause more distortion. You would have to ask someone else if this is noticeable or not, but I would go with the higher efficiency speaker. Hope this helps,  keantoken
__________________
The Kmultiplier rail filter! = The Simple Kuartlotron Superbuffer! Need something built, repaired or modded? PM me and ask what I can do! 
27th June 2008, 03:43 AM  #3  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba

Quote:
http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/2004AboutdB/
__________________
DIY Audio Projects [ 10" DIY Subwoofer  FE127E Sealed Bipole  [ LM3886 Chip Amp / Gainclone  K12M Tube Amp Kit ] 

27th June 2008, 04:44 AM  #4  
diyAudio Member

Quote:
Excellent article, I wish I had read it back when I was studying these concepts, it would have helped me to grasp them much easier! Justin 

28th June 2008, 10:09 PM  #5 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maine

Awright so if the 8 ohm one is 89 db and the 16 ohm one 99db then they'll both play at the same level of loudness at the same position on the volume control? Idk why this is confusing for me.

28th June 2008, 10:18 PM  #6 
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator

Let me see if I can make this a little easier. Please understand these are just the basics, there are other factors.
2X the power = 3 dB louder 10X the power = 10dB louder 10dB = double the "volume" to your ear. This is more clear if you understand logarithms. To partly answer your question, if the volume control remains the same on an 8 & 16 ohm driver with the same sensitivity (read efficiency) you will hear an increase of 3 dB. 3dB is not a huge amount but you can certainly hear it. 
28th June 2008, 10:31 PM  #7 
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator

So as not to confuse, the idea behind leaving the volume control the same spot is that you hypothetically send half the power (3dB) to the speaker with a 16 ohm load as you would an 8 ohm. There's more to it than that but you get the idea.

29th June 2008, 02:00 AM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chinook Country.Alberta

speaker dork at al.....
dB(difference) in units of power :=10 × log(P1/P2), so twice the power yields 3dB, and 10X's the power yields 10dB
An example (use a scientific calculator or a widget on your desktop): If P1=10 watts. P2=20 watts: dB (power) =10 × log(20/10) dB= 10 × log (2) dB = 10 × (0.3010) dB = 3.01 dB (difference) in SPL:= 20 × log (P2/P1), as sound pressure levels are related to 1/R^2..where R is the distance from the source. An example : if P1=30 watts, P2=10 watts dB (power) =20 × log(10/30) dB= 20 × log (1/3) dB = 20 × (.4771) dB = 9.5424 so a reduction of nearly 10dB! Most amplifiers are constant Voltage devices (Nelson Pass' First Watt amps are the only constant current amps I currently know of ), so from Ohm's Law, V:= I × R, and ; Power (in watts) := I × V , which is the equivalent to I^2 × R So if V is constant, then R must increase as I^2 decreases. An example : if R=8 ohms, P=10 watts, then I^2=P/R> so I=√(10/8), > I= √5/2 if R=16 ohms P=10 watts then I^2 > I=√(10/16), > I=√5/(4 × √2) which is clearly smaller than if R=8. Although power remains the same, the ability to drive current may actually increase, or at least the apparent load to the amp may decrease. Most amps are limited not by voltage, but by current. stew
__________________
stew ☮ "A sane man in an insane world appears insane." 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


New To Site?  Need Help? 