|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#171 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hot Spring Village AR
|
One of the problems here is that the XP mixer is indeed screwed up. Either KS or ASIO is required to avoid SRC. The problem was fixed in Vista. But so many people avoided Vista for a number of issues real or perceived and never found out that exclusive mode and DS work correctly. And worse, these people extrapolate the XP problems into 7. Use exclusive mode and it doesn't matter what you use, DS, KS (which is very buggy when used with Vista/7) or ASIO.
As for Linux/Wine, I have no experience, but from what I read on the Foobar forum, Wine has some issues. Bob |
|
|
|
|
#172 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kamloops, BC
|
Quote:
As Shibata-san explains: "An accurate equalizer for winamp 2(yes, it's old). It uses FIR filter with 16383 taps, which is substantially longer than other equalizers. Although it has many knobs to change frequency characteristics, it does not degrade audio quality." I have to agree. The audio quality seems to be completely unaffected by this EQ. In fact, this is one of the main reasons why I currently prefer DeadBeef over Audacious. Audicious' SRC plugin is extremely flexible (as discussed in my earlier post) but DeadBeef has the advantage of using Shibata-san's fantastic SSRC (Shibatch Sample Rate Converter). It can only be configured to apply a single output rate to all input rates, but it is an extremely high quality SRC and it is very fast. I use this when I want to play anything higher than 48kHz (my USB DAC only does up to 48, but I am going to be addressing that issue shortly). If you don't like DeadBeef for some reason and/or prefer Audacious for other reasons (SRC configuration flexibility), you can use one of the LADSPA DSP EQs (lots of them provided in the plugin packages that I mentioned). I didn't look at all of them, but one of them has 15 bands for sure and works quite well. There are also various parametric EQ DSPs, bandpass filter DSPs, crossover filter DSPs, etc. etc. I did not try very many of them because I just really like DeadBeef (and the fact that the 18-band SuperEQ plugin is nicely integrated into the DeadBeef interface).
__________________
I am glad I don't know what jitter is, otherwise I might hear it. Last edited by cogitech; 14th October 2011 at 05:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kamloops, BC
|
Foobar-in-WINE is unnecessary and suboptimal. There's no doubt about that.
__________________
I am glad I don't know what jitter is, otherwise I might hear it. Last edited by cogitech; 14th October 2011 at 05:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#174 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
For me XP and Direct Sound work great. Bit perfect if I want it.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kamloops, BC
|
This would drive me nuts... But that's just me.
Off Topic: A pirate walks into a bar with a steering wheel in his pants. Bartender: "What's with the steering wheel in your pants?" Pirate: "Arrrrr, it's driving me nuts!"
__________________
I am glad I don't know what jitter is, otherwise I might hear it. |
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
LOL!
I always assumed that the driver did the resampling, tho I don't know why. Doesn't matter, I don't let it change the sample rate. So no steering wheel in my britches.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
|
#177 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
|
In computer architecture perspective, the highest standard requirement of Digital Signal Processing (DSP) for audiophile is recap as below:
1) “Bit Perfect” audio condition 2) Stereo 24Bit/192KHz Studio Master quality 3) Speed of audio streaming at least 1.12 MB/s (i.e. 2x24x192,000=9,216,000 bps) Since the operating system of PC does not design for audiophile purpose, the general guildlines to meet the captioned three conditions are listed as below: Condition#1: It requires by-pass for both hardware and software. Hardware bypass is the SRC (Sample Rate Converter) in audio codec by software driver. Software bypass is the original audio mixer by software driver to direct route from Application software to hardware. Condition#2: It depends on the three factors of source, interface and DAC chipset to support up to 24Bit/192KHz Studio Master quality Condition#3: It depends on the speeds of CPU and computer bus Take Microsoft Window O/S as the platform for example, the following two configurations are proved to true to fulfill the captioned three conditions. 1) CPU: Intel Prentium III or above for both desktop and notebook computers 2) O/S: Window XP or above 3) Audio codec: HD Audio codec (built-in on board) 4) Media player: Footbar2000 with ASIO4All plug-in (To bypass Window KMixer) 1) CPU: Intel Prentium III or above for old desktop computer 2) O/S: Window XP or above 3) Audio codec: AC97 Audio codec (built-in on board) 4) Media player: Footbar2000 with ASIO4All plug-in (To bypass Window KMixer) 5) Add-on Interface: Creative Labs Audigy 2 PCI sound card (To replace AC97 bypass SRC) For detail explanation, please refer to my [ARTICLE] here in which I have just finished.
__________________
"To work smarter, but not to work harder." by alant4321 http://www.teco-audio.com |
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kamloops, BC
|
Correction from one of my posts above. I was mistaken. DeadBeef does not use Naoki Shibata's SSRC plugin, it uses Secret Rabbit Code SRC (which is pretty good, but not as good as SSRC, AFAIK).
__________________
I am glad I don't know what jitter is, otherwise I might hear it. Last edited by cogitech; 14th October 2011 at 06:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
|
I want to add a remark that some people may classify the sound of music with American style, British style, Asian style, etc… This DSP approach is not classified for any style. It just moves the source code exactly from Master Recording Studio at 24Bit/192KHz to the home for broadcasting without any third party treatment. If the source code is recorded with American singer, then music is American style as well as recorded with British singer, then British style and so on. In contrast, it simulates the situation that this DSP approach moves you from home to sit at Master Recording Studio for listening to the singer with real live effect.
__________________
"To work smarter, but not to work harder." by alant4321 http://www.teco-audio.com |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Single Driver Omni-speaker? | chuck55 | Full Range | 2 | 1st December 2008 05:12 AM |
| Controlling Vent Anomalies in Single-Driver Speaker Enclosures | Taterworks | Full Range | 0 | 1st June 2008 10:47 PM |
| Single Ended, Single driver: In-room distortion measurements | Gerrit Boers | Full Range | 4 | 27th November 2007 08:12 AM |
| WTB Single driver hempcone speaker | spwal | Swap Meet | 0 | 19th December 2006 03:06 AM |
| Small single driver speaker suggestion (and power rating question) | percy | Full Range | 68 | 17th March 2005 06:04 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12455 seconds (80.84% PHP - 19.16% MySQL) with 11 queries |