|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
I already have FE126E and they have about 100 hours and I like them alot.
Now I would like to know if the FX120 and the F120A are better Can anyone comment on these 3 speakers as a comparison of sound quality. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Soon.... mine will be an all EnABLed trio thou
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Well, I have all 3 drivers here... and in the following enclosures:
FE126E - Ed's Hornshoppe horns FX120/F120A - 10-liter ported enclosure on stands. First, the FE126E is a different animal from the other two... higher sensitivity by a good margin but much less expensive with a stamped frame and ceramic magnet. The FX120 and F120A shared some common components: die-cast frame, cone and alloy dustcover (different color on front, rear is the same). The main difference is the magnet assembly, the F120A being alnico and over twice the price of the FX120. So, how do they sound (in my view)? FE126E - well-known (all around) performer, very good bang for the buck and is flexible in varied designs. It's get loud with little input.... but I don't like the fact that it develops what I call "upper midrange shout" if driven too loud (starts shouting at 1-watt). FX120 - an expensive driver (~$106) with a nicely done die-cast frame, cone assembly, etc. with a large ceramic magnet. Less sensitivity (so more power required for similar levels) but a much flatter response. Also note different enclosure... not recommended for a rear-loaded horn. In short, a more refined sound IMHO. Less fatiguing for long listening periods and better resolution. F120A - a very expensive driver at ~$227 each. Main difference from above is the alnico magnet assembly, but the surround is also slightly different. Overall freq response similar but a bit flatter and rolls off a bit earlier on top. Sonically, this is significantly better! Alnico retrieves the low-level detail much better. You just need more power with these, 8+ watts but SET preferred. These are my first choice (small) Fostex drivers, but alas only 89dB. Regards, KM |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
looks like you get what you pay for.
even thou the drivers are all targeted to different enclosures |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
kamier, how do the f120a & fx120 surrounds differ and are they both made of the same type of foam?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
The F120A has a foam surround which is very fine cell and a gray color. The FX120 also has a fine cell foam surround but is black in color. The question: Is it just a dye added or is it a different foam?
The cone appears to be the same Kenaf paper as the rear of both cones look the same. The FX120 has what appears to be a clear coating on the front of the cone. The F120A has a near-black color coating on the front of the cone. Again, the question: Is it just a dye added or a different coating? One thing is certain... the F120A wins the listening test hands down. Regards, KM |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...98#post1458998 While it is hard to tell from the freq resp on the data sheet, the FX120 *looks* a little smoother and more extended.
__________________
DIY Audio Projects [ 10" DIY Subwoofer | FE127E Sealed Bipole | [ LM3886 Chip Amp / Gainclone | K-12M Tube Amp Kit ] |
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Would it be possible to tweak the fx120 to make it even better? What are the weaknesses in its design that could be improved by DIYers?
BTW, What do you think is the best box for the fx120? |
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
From the factory specs it should fit in the same, or close to the same, boxes as the FE127 dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| help! dented my fx120 | audiothings | Full Range | 24 | 9th June 2008 10:06 PM |
| Fostex FX120 | Jeroenkv | Full Range | 3 | 2nd May 2007 09:54 AM |
| FX120 BIB or Bipole | inrank | Full Range | 18 | 5th November 2006 08:43 PM |
| Fostex F120A | commstech | Full Range | 10 | 27th October 2004 04:39 PM |
| Fostex F120A vs FX120 or Alternatives | Dr. ODD | Multi-Way | 22 | 15th June 2004 09:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13437 seconds (70.04% PHP - 29.96% MySQL) with 10 queries |