|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Hi,
did anybody has experience with a big line array with 9 or more Jordan JX 92 S? How does it sounds? Any limit or compression if you listen music? Do you have a plan to build such a Line Array? Thanks for your help. regards Josef |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
I doubt there will many with JX92 line arrays, although there is a JXR6 line array using 9 units per side, if you search the forum. An array of 4 would probably do most of us but even there the spacing between drive unit centres might lead to frequency lobing problems above 2kHz or so.
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: victoria BC
|
Quote:
$$$=?
__________________
you don't really believe everything you think, do you? community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
|
I truly doubt that there are many Jordan line arrays out there. And if there were they would probably drive a Bently or the like and know the Kenedys personally ( i wouldnt brag about that).
The only reasonable array i can conceive of ( not counting Jims floor to roof array and sitting in the Fresnel zone) is a focused array. There you could get away with 4 drivers. ron |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
|
I've considered an MTM with two pairs of jx92s, but I can't justify anything more than that.
Sheldon |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
The current issue of HiFi News reviews the Aurousal speaker and doubles up to provide a (rather widely spaced) pair of JX92s per side. The reviewer didn't find any real benefits apart from available volume.
For a Jordan array, the best route is the JXR6 (when EAD get it back into production) which has been designed for this purpose. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Or Bandor 50. I was calling Misses Bance on Friday. She said 50 module is constantly improved (smoothed HF response). 300mm module is virtual. I have no idea how make an order from Bandor, it's a challenge
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
|
I could have cobbled something together when I had 100 drivers sitting in my basement
but alas they are almost all gone. Regardless, I would have to agree with stokessd.The JXR6 would be a good candidate but it probably won't be cheap either.
__________________
Brian |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jordan JX6 full-range line array | bcherry | Full Range | 74 | 3rd April 2007 07:53 AM |
| Jordan JXR6 linear array with JX92s | xcortes | Full Range | 4 | 20th November 2006 03:44 AM |
| FS Jordan JX92S | JohnnyBoy | Swap Meet | 0 | 17th October 2006 10:58 PM |
| Jordan JX92S | Gaffer74 | Full Range | 11 | 31st May 2006 09:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |