Fostex FE206E Project - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Full Range

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th October 2007, 08:01 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington State
Default Fostex FE206E Project

I have never built a speaker before, but I want to give it a try around a pair of Foxtex FE206E drivers. The Cain and Cain Abby is my inspiration. Is there a public domain plan for it? Any other suggestions? My goal is to build a speaker the favors jazz and vocals.

I currently have a Golden Tube SE-40 Special Edition that I have modified to use all paper in oil caps. I have a Basie pre-amp from DIY HiFi Supply that I built with all the upgrades they offer. I have a Linn Genke CD player and Vandersteen 2c signature speakers. My room is 25 feet wide by 35 feet deep. Acutally it is open to the kitchen which gives a depth of 55 feet. Its an older house so the height is only 8 feet.

Thanks in advance for any feedback.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2007, 08:35 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
You'd probably be better off posting in the full range forum. However...

The Abby uses the FE166E (the Nearfield & Super Abby's used the FF165K) & is an ML TQWT. The designs are not public domain, and frankly, you wouldn't be missing out on much because the actual line is sub-optimal. Terry Cain was a genius with materials & the cabinets were tuned as much (probably more) through careful selection of these than any real QW theory. Valid take, but if you tried to replicate his exact pipe, it won't work as well as you're not using the same materials.

If you want something true to the look but with better performance (assuming you don't have TC's materials knowledge), then something like this should do. It's using the FE167E, rather than the FE166, which is a better match to this sort of cabinet. Internal dimensions:

70in x 7.5in x 12in (HxWxD at base) Tapers to a point at the top (what's called an So=0 design if you're interested). Driver-centre is mounted at the 0.5 line length point, 35in from the point & the base. Circular port 3in diameter x 3in long, 4in up from the internal base. Either line the rear & one side-wall of the cabinet with your favourite damping material from the top 40in down, or stuff 0.45lbs ft^3 of hollow-fibre material from the top 40in down. Quasi-anechoic response attached -should be ~flat to 40Hz. You can tailor the response in-room by adjusting the damping to taste if it's a little boomy (I prefer to design flat & let people tailor it to their own situation as every room is different). Might need a BSC circuit on it (something the Abby lacks) -depends on how far out into the room it is, but I doubt it in this case actually, based on what my current MLTLs with these drivers are doing.

You might also be interested in the Metronomes: http://www.frugal-horn.com/metronome.html

Hope that's of some use
Scott
Attached Images
File Type: gif ml tqwt.gif (5.6 KB, 485 views)
__________________
Community sites www.frugal-horn.com http://frugal-phile.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2007, 02:12 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington State
Thanks for the reply and for the design idea. I guess I didn't give the impression I intended. After all I am just a newbie. I listed the Abby specifically, but it is just my inspiration. I know that the Abby uses the FE166E, but the Cain-Cain site lists the FE206E and it appears to have a flatter response. And, I found a place that sells them. I will look for information about the FE167. Your response talks about a baffle, but does not say where it is located or what its shape is. Also, I was thinking of using furniture grade plywood. What are your thoughts on that? How thick should it be?
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2007, 08:44 AM   #4
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally posted by thoburnse40
Also, I was thinking of using furniture grade plywood. What are your thoughts on that? How thick should it be?
When looking for plywood, you want 2 things -- lots of plys, and no voids. 18mm Baltic Birch has 13 layers (and is what we use)

Some broad generaizations:

The FExy6 drivers typically need a horn to get the best out of them, the FExy7s are happier in more conventional boxes.

FExy7s tend to be smoother than FExy6 but don't have quite the dynamics.

As the drivers get bigger efficiency tends up, bass gets more extended, dynamics get better, boxes get bigger but the mids, top & finesse suffer.

Which one is best depends on what & how you listen to music, and any space/WAF constraints you have.

For me, the sweet spot are the 4-5" drivers.

dave

BTW... a friend has Abbus. I was not all that impressed with then with the FE166. They seem better with FF165 (but these are with stock drivers, and i've been spoiled by modded drivers)
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2007, 10:19 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Scottmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
No commercial Cain & Cain box ever used the FE206E. The FR drivers commercially used were: the FF85K, FE108ESigma, FF165K, FE166E, FE168Sigma (rapidly replaced by the FE168ESigma), and FE208ESigma. Terry Cain might have used it in one of his numerous DIY projects, but that's all. They FExx6E series are not ideal in a resonant cabinet without some form of correction; the FExx7E drivers are better, as Dave notes.

There are plenty of sources of all the Fostex drivers -Madisound, Solen, DaveP10 who replied above etc & does modifications which massively improve the performance of the units over the stock drivers. So have a browse around. In terms of the driver response the 166 is flatter than the 206 (though of course it doesn't go as low). Frankly, I'm not much of a fan of the 166 though -it's a little sharp across the midband -the 167 is the better unit IMO. As Dave notes, the smaller drivers are smoother still, but you've got a pretty big space & they'd stuggle to fill it.

Re the material, 18mm BB or apple ply as Dave says is about the best of the plywoods. FWIW, when Terry Cain built his first TQWT (it was a DIY box, before he started selling speakers) he used ply for the sides, chipboard (particleboard) for the rear baffle and solid alder for the front. IIRC, it was all 3/4in thick. He added the circular false baffle, made of 1in maple I believe. A shot of the result is attached below, with a lovely purple dye / stain.

BTW -the above enclosure will take the FE207E is you wanted an 8in unit, no changes needed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg diy37rat1.jpg (20.9 KB, 472 views)
__________________
Community sites www.frugal-horn.com http://frugal-phile.com/
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY center BLH with Fostex FE206E? hagr Full Range 12 17th July 2009 11:28 AM
Fostex FE206E gus6464 Full Range 4 13th December 2008 10:39 PM
WTD: Fostex FE206E woodturner-fran Swap Meet 0 22nd April 2008 01:19 AM
Zen amp and Fostex FE206E broadcast guy Swap Meet 3 10th June 2004 02:23 AM
Fostex FE207e vs. FE206e Kashmire Full Range 0 15th January 2004 05:18 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2