Inconsistencies in driver specifications
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 10th October 2007, 09:54 AM #1 Gerrit Boers   diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2007 Inconsistencies in driver specifications I have this crazy idea of building my own fullrange driver. To get a handle on the things involved in driver design I'm studying what's out there. I looked at the specifications for the Lowther drivers and there is something I do not understand: In 'Testing Loudspeakers' Joe D'Appolito describes two methods for calculating the efficiency of a driver. The first uses fs, Vas and Qes to calculate the efficiency: N0= 9.6 x 10^-10 ((fs^3 x Vas) / Qes) (equation 2.35) If you look at the specs for the Lowther DX2, DX3 and DX4 you'll see that the specified fs, Vas and Qes are the same for all three drivers, yet the stated efficiency is not the same. How can this be? Next I looked at the Fertin 20EX fieldcoil driver. The stated efficiency is 101dBSPL/W/m (max current in the fieldcoil), the Bl product is 8.7. Sd=0.02m^2 Re=6.4? Mms=18g Using the following equation: S0= 20log((Bl x Sd)/(Re x Mms))+88.5 (equ. 2.38) I get 92 dBSPL/ 2.83V / m, quite a difference. Am I doing something wrong? Or is there something else going on here?
 10th October 2007, 10:11 AM #2 MJK   Account disabled at member's request   Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Clifton Park, NY The Lowther specs on the manufacturer's site are not accurate. I have measured a bunch of Lowther drivers and have posted the results on my site. I believe you will have better luck using my results.
 12th October 2007, 11:33 AM #3 Gerrit Boers   diyAudio Member   Join Date: May 2007 Thanks for the link Martin. 'Not accurate' seems to be quite an understatement. Lowther specifies an Fs of 36Hz for the DX2, DX3 and DX4. Your results are 56Hz, 60Hz and 59Hz for these three models. Based on your results I also question the validity of the specified flux density, which was the part that interested me javascript:smilie('') Is it really that difficult for a manufacturer to provide an accurate and comprehensive set of specifications? If a car's specifications would be this inaccurate all hell would break loose.
MJK
Account disabled at member's request

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Quote:
 Originally posted by Gerrit Boers Is it really that difficult for a manufacturer to provide an accurate and comprehensive set of specifications? If a car's specifications would be this inaccurate all hell would break loose.
For a car, anybody driving it would know immediately that someting was wrong.

But most DIY speaker builders, and in particular the single driver users, do not have the capability to measure the drivers. I don't mean to pick on single driver users but this subset of speaker builders tend to be more into the esoteric subjective aspects of audio then the multi-way builders who tend to measure and engineer everything about their speakers. So my guess is that most Lowther users do not know, and probably do not care, what the T/S parameters are for their drivers.

Lowthers have been around for a long time but if you search the Internet there are very few (actually close to none) measured T/S parameters or SPL response plots available. Compare that to the latest popular SEAS or Vifa midrange drivers where you can probably find all the measured data you want.

I think the biggest problem Lowther has is the variability of the foam suspensions used in their drivers. It must be extremely difficult to get a repeatable foam spider or surround stiffness from a thin sheet of foam. The moving mass, BL, Re, are reasonably repeatable but the Cms and therefore Vas are diffcult to get matching between two units. But in the end they are great drivers and I enjoy the ones I have very much. I cannot speculate on why Lowther continues to show specs that are very suspect on their web site.

 12th October 2007, 11:57 AM #5 richie00boy   Did it Himself diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK n0 is the reference efficiency, which is not the same as the dB/watt efficiency published by manufacturers. __________________ www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, modules and more.
Scottmoose
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Quote:
 Originally posted by MJK But in the end they are great drivers and I enjoy the ones I have very much. I cannot speculate on why Lowther continues to show specs that are very suspect on their web site.
Probably because, as you mentioned earlier Martin, many (most?) Lowther owners simply don't care about the T/S parameters of the drivers, apart from possibly Fs. And in my turn, I suspect the 'optimistic' claimed Fs of their drivers is partly responsible for a lot of Lowther cabinet designs appearting to be so mediocre.
__________________
"'That'll do", comes the cry of the perfectionist down the ages.' James May -The Reassembler
www.wodendesign.com Community sites www.frugal-horn.com http://frugal-phile.com/

Gerrit Boers
diyAudio Member

Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
 n0 is the reference efficiency, which is not the same as the dB/watt efficiency published by manufacturers.
I know, but if Fs, Vas and Qes are the same for two drivers, the efficiency must also be the same. BTW, interesting that the efficiency increases with the cube! of Fs.

Quote:
 And in my turn, I suspect the 'optimistic' claimed Fs of their drivers is partly responsible for a lot of Lowther cabinet designs appearting to be so mediocre
Exactly my point, how are you supposed to design a decent enclosure when the stated Fs is so far off?

I guess I was 'lucky' with the Fostex208S, the measured T/S parameters are within 5% of the specs.

MJK
Account disabled at member's request

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Quote:
 I guess I was 'lucky' with the Fostex208S, the measured T/S parameters are within 5% of the specs.
I have found that in general the Fostex manufacturer's stated T/S parameters are reasonably accurate. Lowther and AER are not very accurate. I always run one of my T/S consistency check worksheets to assess a manufacturer's data sheets when considering a driver and it is surprising how many of the premium expensive full range drivers do not have consistent properties. Then if I actually get my hands on a pair of these premium drivers, reality is something totally different which is not such a big surprise. If you design an enclosure using real numbers the odds of coming up with a good design are increased significantly. The down side is that sometimes you have to buy on faith that it will work out in the end, that can get expensive.

 14th October 2007, 12:59 AM #9 ronc   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2003 think the biggest problem Lowther has is the variability of the foam suspensions used in their drivers. It must be extremely difficult to get a repeatable foam spider or surround stiffness from a thin sheet of foam. The moving mass, BL, Re, are reasonably repeatable but the Cms and therefore Vas are diffcult to get matching between two units. It must be extremely difficult to get a repeatable foam spider or surround stiffness from a thin sheet of foam The major problem in manfacturing is repeatability. I have been fighting this for over 40 years. Sometimes there are so many variables that its hard to concieve. The answer is that consistant base materials have to be established to produce the final product. Manfacturing defects have to be be brought to a minimum to arrive at a consistant product. Control of the manfacturing process has to be established from all aspects. Without control we are little more than any China produced products. ron
 14th October 2007, 07:22 AM #10 planet10   frugal-phile(tm) diyAudio Moderator     Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III Another issue is that T/S parameters aren't really a single number, but a curve that is a function of voltage drive. The measured parameters of same set of drivers by 2 different people can be quite different. (these numbers are also affected by temperature, barometric pressue and humidity). In every case they should be consistent within the set thou. The measures i get for instance of the Fostex FE126 & 127 i get are fairly different from the factory but show good consistency. the sims run for the Fonken (using factory specs) are quite consistent with the measures of the axtual boxes. Martin, have you measured the FE126s you got from me? It would be interesting to compare your numbers with the ones i have pf the same drivers. dave __________________ community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Holton Precision Audio         CSS         Dx Classic Amplifiers         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Hi Speed Power Supplies 2 9th June 2007 05:08 PM Xor Multi-Way 0 15th October 2006 12:39 AM qawal1 Car Audio 2 30th May 2006 04:42 PM Hayden Subwoofers 14 23rd February 2006 07:59 AM robinbowes Multi-Way 0 21st December 2004 07:55 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43 PM.