|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Hi, everyone. I'm considering a rear-loaded horn design for a pair of floorstanding 2-way loudspeakers. I know this is the full-range forum, and none of my drivers are running close to full range, but this is the area of the forum that seems to have the most experience with rear-loaded horn enclosures.
So, aside from build complexity, what are the disadvantages of a rear-loaded horn design?
__________________
If it works, but you don't know why it works, then you haven't done any engineering. Taterworks Audio (nothing for sale) |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Worcestershire
|
An intrinsic problem is time smear. Sound from the backwave arrives delayed with respect to the front.
Opinions differ about the audibility and importance of this effect, but it is unavoidable. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
I read somewhere that in a BLH there is usually a dip in the response around the mid-bass region (70-90hz) because of the delay, is this true?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
I doubt it is unique but Tannoy, in their Autograph and Westminster adopted a front horn that went down to about 200Hz and used the folded rear horn to extend the response to a claimed 18Hz to 20Hz (-6db). That system keeps the delayed rear wave to only the lower frequencies and maybe that hides some of the audible effect. There are some threads looking at clones of these two speakers and as far as I can recall none/few builders commented on hearing time smear/delay/slowness in the bass. Reviews of the Westminster actually major on the bass impact and reproduction of bass transients as a major advantage of the combined BLH FLH system. They say there is nothing like it from any boxed speaker.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
Assuming a BW below ~250 Hz (though some claim as high as 400 Hz) and if you XO it below the 3rd harmonic dip, then nothing since the time delay will be minor and down in our rapidly rolling off hearing acuity BW. WRT the dip's location, it's a function of the horn's design, so not necessarily in the 70-90 Hz BW. Agreed, if a HE single driver is used in a relatively low impedance system, a BLH works best with a FLH to cover the acoustic XO BW between the driver's front and rear radiation since otherwise you have to either accept the broadband dip in the response or suffer the time 'smear' of a too high acoustic XO. The way around all this though is to design using either a relatively high Qts driver or a HE driver with significant added series resistance to lower its effective Qts/mass corner/acoustic XO point or use a matching impedance amp. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Info needed about Expo-Falthorn or Rutsche rear loaded horns? | Norris Wilson | Full Range | 1 | 30th June 2011 04:01 PM |
| My 103E Rear loaded horns | shporsche | Full Range | 17 | 15th July 2009 11:16 PM |
| 8inch woofer rear loaded horns with tweeters | Naudio | Full Range | 1 | 10th January 2009 09:54 AM |
| Need info on designing front/rear loaded bass horns | jSisco | Multi-Way | 7 | 4th June 2003 12:47 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08311 seconds (76.90% PHP - 23.10% MySQL) with 10 queries |