|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
wierd... I would think that bass would be a non-issue with BiBs and the hemp-8. My fostex 166e units have considerable bass (I play quite a bit of dub/bassy music). Interesting... Hemp-8s are lined up for my next large speaker project, so I'll stay tuned in to this thread to see what the experts suggest.
good luck 7/10 |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Utah
|
I guess I had better clarify my above Hemp BIB comments a little more. Don’t get me wrong the BIB design is able to produce bass. In fact, when the Hemp driver first arrived I built a small baffle for each driver and then mounted them and had a listen. There was no bass at all, and the overall sound was not that good (this was a very small baffle, about 12” square). The comparison between the BIB and small open baffle is like night and day.
Maybe we have unrealistic expectations. Most of our experience has been with the more traditional closed/ported speaker designs. One of the end goals is a stronger, transient, bass response. You know… the kind that hits you in the chest. Bass aside, the driver has a bunch of other aspects that we both really like and so the search for a new cabinet design. Here is a photo of the BIB next to a Jordan MLTL. As you can see the Jordan is quite a bit smaller and less efficient, but at similar SPL levels is able to match the bass output of the Hemp BIB design. In the end it really isn’t the bass that is pushing us to look for another design, but rather the cabinet colorations of the horn. Maybe we just don’t like horn speaker or maybe we still need to play around with stuffing. I don’t really know, this is my first attempt at a horn speaker. One thing for sure I don’t really want to climb inside this speaker again (yes that is right; the Hemp BIB is so big I am able to fit inside the cabinet). I guess with any speaker design there are tradeoffs. As stated above, I may try a sealed box just to see what effect it has on the sound coming from the Hemp. If I am able to keep the dynamics of the BIB and lose the “echo”, then we will be getting somewhere. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
...after looking at the pic, all I can say is
" HOLY CR*P ! " What a great excuse to try a SoFH. 7/10 |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
The ripple i heard in the BIBs was what inspired Karlson slot in the iBIBk -- some people are sensitive the ripple (me. you & your buddy it sounds like) and some aren't. In terms of horns, the BIB is pretty crude, so don't judge all horns by it. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Well I've been banging my head againt a pair of FR8c on open baffle for over a week. It's a "Lampizator" style baffle. About 15" wide, 46" tall. Active bass on the bottom.
Yeah, the FR8 does beam less than I expected, but it does beam, just like any 8"FR is going to. But I'm comparing it to an Altec 811 horn, which is much wider. On the 15x45" baffle, the FR8c has NO low end, none. A lot like the 12" square baffle that Hardman mentions. I had hoped for more, but it rolls off fast under 300 Hz, which leaves it sounding much too bright. Been doing "Jedi mind tricks" on it to tilt the response down a bit. Simple inductors or an RL parallel shelving filter. So far it's good, but not great. Maybe I'll have to try the JELabs baffle. On the tall, thin baffle I get no joy (yet).
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Utah
|
Dave - Thanks for the reply. Good to hear that not all horn speakers sound like the BIB. My faith in other designs has been restored. To be honest I didn’t really read much about the BIBs before building them. Most of the research was done by my friend. I mainly provide the shop and a second set of hands for assembly. I have always wanted to try something horn like so this was a good learning experience if nothing else. There were many plusses offered by the BIB design, but the above mentioned “extras” proved too much for our liking.
Do you think a sealed box is going to lose some of the dynamics offered by the BIB? If so what other type of a design do you propose? Above you suggested the Demetri, still leaning this direction? What is an IBIBK? I assume it is an offshoot of a BIB? I too have played around with the CSS subwoofers and really like them. I have both drivers currently. Just need to find some time to put them into a box. I know you are a fan of push-push enclosures, any designs for the SD12 or SDX15 (I guess if I weren’t so lazy I could just look on your site)? Thanks, Chris |
|
|
|
|
#27 | |||
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Besides the big BIB thread it has its own thread. A couple have been built. It hasn't got to the top of our queue yet. ![]() Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|||
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
A Chang version?
Re the other boxes, Dimitri scores over the MLTLs if you like a wide baffle, & TQWT always sound subjectively a little different to a straight pipe, even though FR plots might look similar -seems to be mostly in the midbass where they seem to have a little more punch, at the price of a touch more ripple. I'm surprised you didn't find the BIBs giving great LF -they should kill most cabinets in this respect. How did you damp them? Admittedly, they're not for everyone -some people are sensitive to the ripple, as Dave says. Scott |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Nebraska Panhandle
|
I, too, am surprised that you don't find the quantity of bass from the Hemp/BIB to your liking. I wish I could give a little of my bass away. Different rooms, different strokes. I still haven't gotten mine outside to finish.
Just a couple of days ago I was pondering hauling them out and cutting a K-slot in them for a change. Dave or Scott, am I right in thinking that a K-slot could diminish LF gain a bit and reduce ripple? I don't find the ripple that objectionable, but I am overloading my room. A K-slot would look cool too. pj |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
|
Right. How much of a ripple reduction it'll give, your guess is as good as mine, as no-one's ever figured out a formula for accurately sizing Karlson slots. But it certainly should help a bit. Plus, as you say, they do look good.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hemp FR8C in Fonken cabinets | xecluded | Full Range | 7 | 9th August 2009 06:22 AM |
| Hemp Acoustics FR8C in Angular Spiral Enclosure | cjctan | Full Range | 45 | 2nd June 2009 04:32 PM |
| Hemp FR8 vs Hemp FR8C - Which One? | Estes | Full Range | 16 | 4th May 2009 07:42 AM |
| Enclosure for a Hemp FR8C | G | Full Range | 17 | 20th January 2008 04:24 AM |
| Aperto cabinet design for Hemp FR8C | rpfunk | Full Range | 20 | 28th August 2007 04:40 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.34877 seconds (38.21% PHP - 61.79% MySQL) with 11 queries |