|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| exaDevices World-class audio devices for do-it-yourself projects from exaDevices |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#931 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Actually what the isolators are doing is effectively breaking a ground loop between the PC and the DAC and it's the ground current circulating within the analogue connectors shielding that is inducing crap into the signal line. You can easily see this as the spikes and its harmonics at multiples of the mains frequency in the non isolated test.
This isn't showing any benefits of isolation on maintaining the integrity of the digital signal, more it's simply showing what a standard ground loop can look like. If you want to see what effect the isolators have you'd need to use a double insulated piece of test equipment that wouldn't form a loop when plugged into the output of the DAC.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
#932 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Quote:
However I disagree that using double isolated measurement equipment will provide more meaningful results. The purpose of this test is to highlight the difference in noise levels when real-world audio equipment is used. Measurement taken with double-insulated equipment will show less or no difference between the two tests. When real amplifier is connected instead of the measurement tool, the noise will be there. Note also that in addition to the harmonics of the mains frequency there is high-frequency noise coming from the computer. It is very important that the ground isolation reduces this high-frequency noise. I would like to explain that the 1 kHz signal at -100dB is used just for visual reference for the noise level. This is necessary because the "measurement equipment" is far from being calibrated. Once you know the scale of the graph, the 1 kHz signal can be turned off. |
|
|
|
|
#933 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
As my previous response to this wasn't quite what you were happy with I'll try again.
The purpose of the ground isolator isn't to break ground loops but to prevent any high frequency hash from finding its way into the audio circuitry. High frequency hash wont tend to flow through a ground loop anyway as high frequency currents follow the path of least inductance and you can bet your bottom dollar that down the mains safety earth and through the audio cable shielding isn't that path. It will however help to reduce the effects of any EMI induced currents from flowing. As you said yourself, the isolator is showing the result of breaking a ground loop, but with it breaking all the traditional crud that can find its way into the loop too. The point of the isolated test equipment would be so that you can show what the isolator does to the performance without the results being impaired by a ground loop. Preventing a ground loop and isolating the two circuit grounds are completely different things, as you can prevent loops from forming whilst keeping the two circuits coupled. What I'd guess people want to see (at least what I'd be interested in seeing) is the effects of decoupling/breaking the two circuit grounds without anything else happening to join the party, such as a ground loop.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
#934 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Thank you for posting again. I see where you are coming from and I appreciate your point. This way or the other ground isolation is helpful. For example ground loops are sometime difficult to trace and understand.
Last edited by exa065; 9th December 2011 at 05:44 PM. |
|
|
|
#935 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think the ground isolation is a very good idea and in this case is one of the times where you can easily use an isolator to do away with any 'headache' that designing to avoid loops can create.
Usually loops are easy enough to understand in principle, the hard part is often coming up with a complete system design that will prevent them from forming.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
#936 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
I am very excited to introduce a new member of the exa family, the e18 DAC. e18 is not a DIY product, but it is a close relative to the exaU2I. It uses a second generation USB to I2S interface and it can handle 8 channels at 384 kHz. Your support for exaU2I made releasing the e18 possible - thank you!
The e18 will help us to further develop our technology and we will make the advancements available to the DIY community. You can find out more about the e18 DAC here. |
|
|
|
#937 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
I'd like to express my gratitude to the advice above very much. Your method easily made me create a DSD256 test audio file! To exa065, I think both your exaU2I board and your new DAC must have capabilities of playing DSD256 or DSD512 sources. Bunpei |
|
|
|
|
#938 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Quote:
- DSD Playback with exaU2IIn our test environment the exaSound e18 DAC can play 6 channels DSD. We need some extra time to release this feature. |
|
|
|
|
#939 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
DCLK for DSD512 is 44.1 x 512 = 22.5792 MHz. As the exaU2I has 11.2896 MHz oscillator on board, this might mean the FPGA logic includes special 2 x multiplying functionality only for DSD512 sources. It's really a well-prepared approach! |
|
|
|
|
#940 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Quote:
Happy Holidays! |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ultimate USB to I2S interface | sampler | Digital Source | 206 | 30th January 2012 03:45 PM |
| High Resolution Multi-Channel Digital Interface | Brian Brown | Digital Source | 34 | 15th January 2008 06:48 PM |
| interface I2S with USB | mermoz | Digital Source | 0 | 21st February 2003 10:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |