|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| exaDevices World-class audio devices for do-it-yourself projects from exaDevices |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#551 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Multiple...
|
Quote:
Or that it is a dual mono setup with two Buffalo´s. If you take out the MCU / Firmware on a Buffalo setup for mono mode there WILL be silence due to the outputs then will be in phase - the MCU / firmware runs half of the outputs in anti-phase in mono mode due to the way the inputs are connected ![]() If there are silence with the MCU / firmware out on a Buffalo then it must be some kind of error in the connections... Wrong lineup of I2S signals, GND connected wrong etc.. I observed Bunpei posted while I was writing..... |
|
|
|
|
#552 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Margaret River West Australia
|
Thanks it everyone for their suggestions-I connected it up again and this time it works perfectly, no dropout loops at higher 96k playback.
Thanks again to everyone for advice and especially to exa065 for his back up and help to get the exaU2I working with the buff 2. Have to say I'm really pissed off with the Twisted Pear Audio administrators - they see these sites and their only input is to claim there's not a problem, when they know this has been a problem for many users for some time. Even a private message was ignored. Ok I got that off my chest, the good news is that this sounds pretty darn good, I have a pretty accurate system that is also very transparent and I tell you what folks, this is what the master tapes really sound like. Theres no coloration or augmentation , this is what it is. What are the implications of using the Buff2 without the MUC chip in I2S mode? Obviously spdif is out, but is there a function for the MUC in I2S? Any other audio company would get replacements to customers but I won't hold my breath here. Thanks again, very relieved to get some tunes. |
|
|
|
#553 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
All credit for solving this case goes to Bunpei and RayCtech. I just facilitated the discussion. Thank you again for your help.
My concern is that I am recommending Buffalo DACs for use with exaU2I. Unless there is an official response from Twisted Pear or we come up with a patch, I will have to modify my message. |
|
|
|
#554 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rock Ridge
|
Hey, I just got your PM this morning and replied. I also just saw this.
Russ just posted about it here as well: DPLL Bandwidth setting on B II - Buffalo DAC - Twisted Pear Audio Support So, the uC on the Buffalo is set to use the optimal DPLL setting, which in our testing with both the XMOS eval and our XMOS solution in development, has provided the best and lowest jitter performance. We have not used this USB interface, so I hesitate to offer an explanation. We have had no issues with high-res material and the current firmware on the Buffalo, or we would have changed it. I would stress that most people using the Buffalo for high-res are not having any issues. If you are having success w/o the firmware chip in place, then the default DPLL settings are what you want, as it can deal with higher jitter from the source (lower jitter rejection). Running w/o the firmware, however, means you have incorrect DAC mapping for the I2S signals, so that is not good either. We will make a "High Bandwadth" version of the firmware available to those who want it with the less optimal default DPLL. That's totally not a problem. I will add a link to the web site for people to order it (will post an URL when I have it set up).
__________________
Twisted Pear Audio Last edited by BrianDonegan; 3rd June 2011 at 01:28 PM. |
|
|
|
#555 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
SPDiF should be on with the default condition. Make sure the comparator switch in the BII board is in the right position
Quote:
If you are going "all out" with the exa device, then the best solution is to tweak the setting that can match your configuration with separate settings for SPDIF and I2S.
__________________
www.hifiduino.wordpress.com |
|
|
|
|
#556 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Maybe this is the way RayCtech power supply modifications improves the audio quality of the device. I seem to recall that glt was able to get a better lock with a stringent DPLL setting on Buffalo after upgrading the PSU on a USB/I2S transport. Just a guess - would be interesting to investigate. Cheers, Nic P.S. Any news regarding OSX drivers :-) |
|
|
|
|
#557 | |
|
Master Burner
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
|
Quote:
Many questions, but here are some answers. Until just recently I was using Fireface 800, but I gave it to my son. Now I use Fireface 400. Your advice on rerouting RME is really cool, but my intention is not to use RME interface but instead USB - I2S converter. I am not sure I could use both at the same time? If that is not the case than you solution is certainly way to go. Wave - I have a full collection, quite honestly there are way to many plug ins there, haha I get lost there finding what I need. I wanted to use native Logic plug ins to simplify life, but certainly I will try wave as well. I might have a few questions, but I will send it to you directly, in order not to pollute this thread, you are correct on that one.I just collected all the parts for my future set up. Now I am up to machining and doing case work to house all. Power supplies are elaborate and will be housed separately. Still trying to conceptualize to whole set up... Will keep you updated. Thank you very much for such a comprehensive and valuable info. I hope there are other people who would try similar set ups.
__________________
www.burningamp.com |
|
|
|
|
#558 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Margaret River West Australia
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#559 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Quote:
Supra has experienced the same issues with 3 different I2S boards. Bunpei has reported the same behavior with his SD Card Player. It appears many I2S devices on the market require flexibility with the Buffalo DAC settings. We all welcome the support from TPA on this issue. As I have mentioned before, the jitter levels of the exaU2I board are well within the jitter cancellation capability of the ES9018 chip. Evidence of this is the customer satisfaction level and the measurements taken on the analogue output of exaU2I-ES9019 couple. It is easy to pick on any device by taking one specification out of the context of the overall result. There is integrity to the exaU2I that is more important tan one specific measurement. For sure the device is not perfect, however it is the first and only solution on the market that can offer 32/384 quad for less than $12000. Mac drivers are under development. We actually enjoy the Mac development environment. However I will miss the Foobar sophistication and freedom when I move on the Mac side ![]() -exa065 |
|
|
|
|
#560 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Quote:
Thank you for offering a solution for using third-party I2S devices. A Buffalo DAC-exaU2I combo offers performance that is hard to match with consumer or professional gear. -exa065 |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ultimate USB to I2S interface | sampler | Digital Source | 206 | 30th January 2012 03:45 PM |
| High Resolution Multi-Channel Digital Interface | Brian Brown | Digital Source | 34 | 15th January 2008 06:48 PM |
| interface I2S with USB | mermoz | Digital Source | 0 | 21st February 2003 10:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |