|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Have been reading about the beneficial effects of amps with a high output impedance. I was wondering if there is a way to take a typical voltage amp with an output impedance of 0.1 ohm and add an output transformer so the output impedance is 47 ohms.
My understanding is that such a thing is possible if the secondary has a 47 ohm resistor across it. However, such a thing strickes me as being wasteful of the amp's power. If you have say, a 100 watt votage amp, is there any way to add an output transformer so it has an output impedance of 47 ohms and also something like 80 watts output? I don't mind losing a little power to the transformer, they are not perfect devices, but simply putting a resistor across the secondary would consume a good deal more than 20% of the power. Any help would be appreciated. PS: This thread is not intended so much for Spice Modelling issues of the transformers, which issues are covered in this thread. This is just about the transformers themselves and the possibility of their changing output impedance.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Why would you want to do that?? Transformers on the output are bad!
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
MJL:
Take a look at this thread, especially the second half when Nelson Pass' paper is examined. You will see some real advantages in high output impedance amps. Yes, there is a tradeoff with putting the signal through another device before it reaches the loudspeaker, but it would be worth at least trying to achieve the advantages a high output impedance amp can give.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
In fact, just to save time, here is the link to Nelson Pass' paper.
However, after reading it please return to the discussion in the thread, much good info was posted there.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
if you wanted to convert 0r1 to 47r using a transformer then a turns ratio of 21.7 does the job.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thank you very much. Your answer is very helpful, as always.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Quote:
"Some esoteric (some might say idiosyncratic) designs use inductors or 1:1 transformers, but these are bulky and very expensive. Unless made to the utmost standards of construction, they will invariably have a negative effect on the sound quality, since the losses are frequency dependent and non-linear." Although not Nelson Pass, a designer I (and many others)hold in high esteem . |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thank you for that information, I will keep that in mind.
Incidentally, Nelson Pass didn't particularly endorse using transformers to do this. He just used transformers to experiment, to see the difference in various curves using high output impedance. That paper did not mean he thinks transformers are any permanent solution.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
KW, I don't know if you had this already in mind, but the turns ratio for your example works out to a fairly common tube OPT turned around backwards.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I did not know that. That is very good information to know.
Any model numbers, or just look up transformer companies with 27:1 ratio output transformers?
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3C24 in a SE output stage - output transformer impedance recommendation !!! | aldovan | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 6th September 2008 11:18 AM |
| CarlosFM regulated powersupply, change output voltage? | jaste | Power Supplies | 1 | 9th December 2006 07:13 PM |
| Output section impedance change query | KBK | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 5th August 2006 02:47 AM |
| Voltage controlled output impedance matching servo | FlukeSkywrecker | Subwoofers | 2 | 7th June 2005 06:32 PM |
| Output transformer Impedance | NickC | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 9th May 2003 06:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.20339 seconds (47.81% PHP - 52.19% MySQL) with 10 queries |