|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Argentina
|
I've been trying to use the toner/iron method to make pcb's using my HP Laserjet1018 laser printer. The problem is that when i tired to print the paper (used glossy photo paper for INKJET printers) the printing came out very bad and the paper had like a thin transparent layer all torn apart, by the heat i pressume. I've tried many different kinds of paper to do this but only that one worked (using a photocopy, which didn't tear the paper apart). I want to use my own printer but i don't know what paper to use.
Another thing, after ironing the pcb and all, some paper remained strongly sticked to the pcb and i couldn't take it out, not without taking the toner off too...again, what paper should i use?! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Argentina
|
i just screwed a pcb because of the stupid paper that stays sticked to the pcb. What paper do i have to use to make pcb? Glossy photo paper didn't work
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
You need to soak it in hot water after ironing.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
|
Having used the toner method extensively, I will simply say that its reputation far exceeds its accomplishments. Yes, people routinely post pictures of circuit boards they made using transfer paper, but have you ever noticed that the boards look as though they were done by a third-grader with a crayon?
The entire system is flawed from the ground up. It's conceptually simple, but bogs down in the real world due to pressure and temperature problems. Then there are the hairline fractures and pinholes in the toner that let the etchant through. And the need to (at least) double print the image in order to get a sufficient amount of toner on the silly paper...only to run into registration problems from multiple runs through the printer. Etc. Etc. Et-flippin'-cetera. It's kinda like the old thing about the pig singing--it's not that the pig sings so well, it's that it sings at all. Screw transfer paper. I went optical. Grey |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
I too have tried the toner method of printing. I have no doubt that you can develop your skill to a point where the method produces passable results. If you are happy to spend weeks experimenting, failing and destroying copper boards
However the photo transfer method is far easier for an occaisional user to perfect (I got it right on my second go) I would even dare to say you can produce pretty amazing work with the same amount of practice that the toner method guys put in to produce useable results... Hope I am not being too controversial I use an overhead projector to do my exposures and get results I am very hapy with from printer to the point of cleaning the copper in less than 15 minutes. My advice, go photo resist... |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Argentina
|
well i have to say that this method is not THE BEST thing but it works well WHEN IT WORKS. I was able to do it a couple of times but that's all. The optic method would be cool if i'd be able to do it at all, i've never seen what's needed to do it around here. BTW, i soaked it in water, didn't work out, the paper remains sticked hard to the pcb
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
Photo resist student packs can be bought, and come with reasonable instructions.
I typically produce a test strip, basicly I just make a long board with traces of varying sizes, down to a grade or two below the smallest trace on my design, I place this on my print alongside my board design and cut it off my transparency. I expose it in sections on the ohp, at time intervals of 30 seconds. Then I develop it and see what timing produces the best result. This I then use as my exposure time on the real design. Its not rocket science, but its easy to controll the exposure this way and I can make many boards on the same afternoon all to the same quality level. Typically I use a student kit once only, they are cheaper to buy than buying the chemicals seperately if your only doing small batches ***Edit*** by the way if you use an ohp, remove the fresnell lense when doing exposures.*** |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
|
hernanstafe,
try thin, glossy paper like that in those 800+ pages catalogues. Quote:
If paper fibre residues keep sticking to the toner (and only the toner), just leave it where it is, as it probably wont affect the etching process. If the paper sticks to the bare copper (i.e. with no toner in between the copper and the paper), the paper is obviously not suitable for the iron on method. Better still: forget the toner/iron method. I've tried it once and yes, it works, more or less, if done right, but it's still a pain in the rear. All you need to process photoresist coated PCBs: -photoresist coated PCBs (duh) -printable transparency sheets (even ordinary copier paper works when soaked in salad oil to make it slightly transparent - need I say soak it in oil after printing?) -sheet of glass (to put on top of and to flatten the transparency sheet during UV exposure) -face tanner as the UV light source (used 5$ off ebay) -sodium hydroxide (NaOH, ~10g/l, to dissolve the developed photoresist) ...etch as you're used to. jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
I went the toner route when I started because I already had a huge pile of double sided 2 oz. FR4 and I didn't want to spend the money on everything involved with a photo setup. The only thing I needed to buy for toner transfer was a $8 pack of photo paper.
I get good results without too much hassle. I don't see myself ever switching to a photo setup as I have a good routine down that works well for me. It's good enough for SMD work.........
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Crunchville, where I don't fit in.
|
Quote:
__________________
Crazy Yankee. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "TECHNO"Amp building in progress-using "Iron Method" | zox2003 | Solid State | 23 | 30th March 2010 08:42 PM |
| PCB making: Toner transfer method | Christer | Everything Else | 49 | 20th March 2010 03:56 PM |
| Weller soldering iron problem | rtarbell | Parts | 2 | 23rd June 2007 04:48 AM |
| toner transfer method(my mistakes) | rs1026 | Everything Else | 3 | 13th October 2004 01:37 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12322 seconds (79.89% PHP - 20.11% MySQL) with 11 queries |