Audible difference between DTS and Dolby? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Everything Else

Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools......

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st February 2007, 03:18 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NZ
Default Audible difference between DTS and Dolby?

Hi all,

Is anyone willing to share thoughts on this? Personally I have always chosen DTS when available, but had never bothered comparing similar versions (5.1, 6.1 matrix, 6.1 discrete) of DTS and Dolby.

I decided to do a comparision a few days ago, and, yes, I think there's an audible difference, and I perfer DTS. I have a low-spec Denon receiver and Zaph's W3-871 Tang Bands all round.

I've read a million magazine articles that say "Dolby formats are more compressed and therefore inferior". Do you agree?

Andrew.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2007, 05:25 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
neutron7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto Canada
Dolby is more well supported

but many DTS soundtracks sound richer and more detailed than DD counterpart.

if it is avaliable i always chose DTS.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2007, 01:25 PM   #3
Schaef is offline Schaef  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, OH
It depends on the movie and the people doing the mix-downs as to which sounds better. I can come up with examples where I didn't like the DTS mix as much as I liked the DD mix, and vice-versa. Personally, when DTS is done right, I like it better, my speakers disappear more when using DTS. The Lord of the Rings special editions are a good example of this.

So to definitively say one is better than the other, can't really be done, it comes down to how well it was done for that movie.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2007, 01:33 PM   #4
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
Quote:
Originally posted by Schaef
So to definitively say one is better than the other, can't really be done, it comes down to how well it was done for that movie.
Agree totally. It's not a case of running an uncompressed version through a converter program. There is an engineer and his ears involved.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Burr Brown OPA227 and OPA134, audible difference? robbie_cro Parts 6 14th June 2008 11:03 PM
Which caps make the most audible difference? TDWesty Solid State 5 31st January 2007 06:49 PM
What is 'audible'? steve Everything Else 3 13th September 2004 11:56 PM
BrianGT Basic v/s Premium - any audible difference ? percy Chip Amps 1 4th September 2004 04:18 PM
RC Tolerance -- audible difference r_s_dhar Analogue Source 6 11th August 2003 08:47 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2