|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
Is it possible to make a magnetic suspension that is self-centering? mrjam's amazing CDP has me wondering if the vertical centering component could be eliminated by a DIYer.
Using three, four or more as required magnets, arranged as if in a bowl shape, with poles appropriately opposed; to suspend a similarly anti-bowl shaped suspended object clear-as-mud ascii rendering --\__/-- -\___/- And the big question: would it still transmit vibrations? Would many small magnets be better than a few strong ones? Could the setup be arranged slightly less than perfectly and still work? Maybe with some platic bump-stops to prevent large shocks from damaging things.
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
If it were stable, it would still transmit vibrations at and below its resonant frequency and isolate from vibration above its resonant frequency. That's really all this stuff is anyway, simple mechanical resonant systems, i.e. spring/mass combinations. Ideally what you want is a resonant frequency that is well below the lowest frequency you want it to isolate and you want the resonance to be very high Q (i.e. very little loss). se |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az.
|
Even if you could make it work, you'd get no end of grief from the golden ears who would complain about audio pollution due to the stray magnetic fields all over the place.
The magnets are really just acting as springs and WILL transfer vibration across the air space between them, as a spring would. If you must use magnets, you could suspend the object from a single wire (balancing will be a problem) and restrict its motion using magnets located under, over, or around it... Another thing to consider is that the whole system is undamped whether you use springs or magnets. I think you would want to damp any vibrations that are transferred so they don't keep things ringing. I_F |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
__________________
Best-ever T/S parameter spreadsheet. http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tml#post353269 |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
diamagnetic interaction can apparently enable stable "passive" magnetic suspension:
http://www.mae.ncsu.edu/courses/Mae5...Levitation.htm (from American Scientist online, search: diamagnetic levitation http://www.americanscientist.org/tem.../assetid/35120 in case they pull the classroom link to the article) |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
interesting. thanks guys.
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Hello,
I read this old post and maybe you guys can help me. I have made a driver (that really works on this moment) with a adjustable magnetic damping system. But I have a problem on this. I use a surround and spider to center the cone and voicecoil. When i reverse the current in the damping coil i can loosen up the damping or i can tighten the damping. My question... I wan't to eleminate the spider and maybe the surround because the magnetic damping is 100% lineair over the whole range. Good spiders also over 80% but most surrounds not. The problem is to magnetic center the whole coil. I tried differtent things but without succes. Thx |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
|
I see that nobody has answered your question yet so I will just throw this in even though it is not quite what you asked for.
I read a review in the now-passed Audio magazine of a commercially produced speaker with a suspension of air instead of a spider. The review said it provided a linear suspension as opposed to a spider, which does not. I do not recall the make of the speaker, but perhaps some old Audio reader remembered the review.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body." -Anonymous |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: PA
|
Nothing is 100% linear. Conventional suspension arrangements are extremely linear over short excursions. It would be hard to produce a magnetic suspension, passive or active, that didn't cause a significant reduction in acoustic output efficiency due to increased moving mass. That's ignoring the power consumption of an active EM suspension. Giving up the cone edge termination of a conventional surround is going to be a problem for anything but the sub-frequency range. Linearity at high power is more practically achieved with larger or more drivers. If it's just a science project that's cool, but making it higher performance overall compared to some optimal arrangement of conventional drivers would be an impressive trick.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
It was started as a science project till i found a solution for a active magnetic suspension that worked better that i hoped for (the goal was to adjust the damping of the speaker in function of a dc current). the only problem was like andrew said, the moving mass. It is the same as an overhung system but i want to make it better. Therefore i have to use alu windings, no spider, no surround and untherhung with neo magnets and very thin voicecoil also alu. To compensate the powerhandling of alu windings also damping and centering i thought ferrofluid can achieve all these. The extra single winding for damping is 1 inch in height. Maybe there is a problem to consider, a moving coil generates a current in a magnetic field so the dampimg changes in function of the freq. This is also near lineair i think but i'm not sure. For know i use a battery for driving the damping winding.
One interesting thing i found out... Almost none damping to a verry stif damping changes the sound almost unnoticeable. Strange i didn't expect that hmm... That put a second Discussion in the world, is the spider so important like everyone think of? I think not, i think moving mass and cone material are the main factors... In my opinion The less parts, the less resonaces makes it only better... I ordered the ferrofluid i keep you posted about my Findings. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| centering hub for cdpro | skyraider | Digital Source | 0 | 1st July 2005 07:08 AM |
| Magnetic suspension for Cd player | peranders | Digital Source | 16 | 14th February 2004 06:32 PM |
| NAD 7020, problem with tuner++ (centering). | hanspd | Solid State | 0 | 26th January 2004 01:37 PM |
| Magnetic suspension linear-tracking tonearm? | Shaun | Analogue Source | 5 | 4th June 2003 10:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |