|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: montreal, quebec
|
I'm looking to build a piece of hardware that I can attach to the effects loop of my mixer (a Vestax PCV-275) to achieve the "wet/dry" effect that's typically available on more expensive club mixers.
I've been searching the web and I haven't been able to find much in the way of the theory behind the actual effect. The best explanation I've come across is that it's an "introduced delay inversely proportional to the frequency". I.e. lower frequency components are delayed less, whereas higher frequencies are delayed more. Either way, I'm not even sure if this is true because I can't corroborate this with other sites. Does anyone know the theory behind the "wet/dry" sound effect? Also, does anyone have any information as to recommended implementations? I've got some experience with digital hardware and DSP programming, but I'd like to take this on as an analogue project. Thanks in advance. D. Carney |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: montreal, quebec
|
Update and correction:
I believe that what I want is a dispersive filter. Can anyone confirm/deny this? Also, I meant an "introduced delay proportional to the frequency", not "inversely proportional". D. Carney |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
I am unfamiliar with the effect, but frequency dependant delays are definitely DSP fodder if you ask me. An anologue solution would likely be very complex and very large.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
|
Wet / dry is usually used by engineers simply to refer to with / without effects - commonly in relation to reverb. The actual FX may well vary, so we'd need more information about your spacific requirement. Is it similar to the common consumer DSP 'hall' FX, or something else?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: montreal, quebec
|
Quote:
The "underwater" effect is what I'm looking for. I.e. not so much reverb as filtering (and potentially delaying) specific frequencies. I.e. a variable, "muted" kind of sound. I do tend to agree with 'pinkmouse' (above) in that it'll likely have to be a digital (DSP) solution. The idea of something analogous to an FFT in analogue hardware sounds like a nightmare. Then again, I haven't done the research because I don't know exactly what I'm trying to do... Maybe it could be done with a simple RCL network D. Carney |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nonstandard tubes for audio? Quadrature grid chorus effect? | m6tt | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 30th January 2008 09:41 PM |
| Hall effect switch / potentiometer - Good for audio? | FastEddy | Parts | 4 | 7th June 2007 04:09 PM |
| audio effect schematic | alecwek | Parts | 15 | 1st November 2004 01:40 AM |
| Running power to tubes so as not to effect the audio signal | A3rd.Zero | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 22nd April 2004 03:07 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08456 seconds (73.66% PHP - 26.34% MySQL) with 10 queries |