|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SIUE, Illinois, USA
|
As far as where current flows, I've heard the following conflicting views:
1.) DC travels throught the cross section of a wire with uniform charge (or current?) density. 2.) AC travels closer to the surface, depending on freqency. 3.) Static charge sits on the surface. and then: 4.) AC and DC travel on the surface ONLY, thus making the only important aspect of a wire the surface area, cross sectional area is not important. the first 3 are from physics, the last is from an EE. I feel the first 3 make sense, where the 4th doesn't
__________________
if only it could be used for good, not evil... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
According to Malcolm Hawksford an AC signal doesn't travel in the wire at all, but in the field above the surface of the wire.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Guys,
Just form the top of my head: From what I concluded from Dr.Macolm Hawksford studies the ideal diameter for an interconnect would be 0.6mm,ideal dielectric would be air. More metal would increase skineffect. It is however a complex matter but the proposed cross section seems to corelate perfectly with experiments carried out in listening tests. For sonic bliss other factors such as cable capacitance play an important role,Dc resistance too etc. In a word it is a bees' nest. FWIW,in my designs I go for low dc resistance and low capacitance/m. If higher currents need to pass unimpeded I suggest bundling a number of the same cross section wires. I always use solid core wire.Always! Other factors are geometry,shielding,solder composition etc. So far it seems to pay off. What Dave suggests,I've read that somewhere as well but I'm a bit err... resisting on that theory. Best regards,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
According to my practical experience over the years, a and b are both true.
I'm sure this is not the whole story, but the theory explains all effects I have observed. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Change cross-section layout for TABAQ ? | tsll | Full Range | 5 | 2nd April 2008 08:38 PM |
| Akabak: modelling horn bends and cross-section discontinuities | philpope | Subwoofers | 0 | 31st July 2007 02:02 PM |
| TL - cross section | 00940 | Multi-Way | 4 | 16th August 2006 12:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09331 seconds (62.34% PHP - 37.66% MySQL) with 10 queries |