|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: somewhere in California
|
Or at least I will...
I made the one have when I was 15, but my metal and woodworking skills have drastically improved over the past five years... I am building it out of four shelves(haven't decided whether I want white oak or mahogany), and rather than constructing the whole thing out of wood, I have four "four-foot" lengths of 6061 aluminum roundstock which will act as the support poles. each corner of every shelf will have a hole drilled in it, and the shelves will be supported on the Al poles with a steel collar under every corner. Instead of setting the whole thing on heavy feet w/carpet-piercing spikes, I'm going to machine a spike on the end of each pole. Which wood is better for vibration isolation? I have heard claims that air-dryed maple is the absolute best(since they use it to make musical insturments), but it is not readily available, and is outrageously expensive. Has anybody else made their own rack? -Trevor PS- I would like to use brass roundstock, but it's considerably more expensive than aluminum
__________________
"This is just my 'one cent'; I haven't got two to give." |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: AARHUS. DK
|
I did a rack 4 years ago to hold my gear. It's designed to be strong whitout being to "heavy" to look at. Here's a bit more info: http://kofoedmejer.squarespace.com/d...alleryId=20186
Regards TroelsM
__________________
Need more time... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Trevor, I'm planning to make a rack sometime over the next few months as well ...
I don't see how timber is going to help with vibration in any way. You want something more springy than timber. I'm also planning to run cables through some columns out the back to try to avoid having them visible (speaker, power and interconnects). Also I plan to have an adjustable system, more readily adjustable than a flexirack, yet one that doesn't look as adjustable - possibly some capscrews. So there will be a few spines carrying cables and acting as structure with some rods allowing adjustment. I mention this just in case you want some ideas
__________________
AUDIO BLOG | Bass integration guide My work: www.redspade.com.au web design studio |
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: somewhere in California
|
Quote:
but PS- I rest my turntable on a bed of bubble wrap. Quote:
__________________
"This is just my 'one cent'; I haven't got two to give." |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Quote:
Quote:
You may like the result of using wood - perhaps there is some coloration added that you like. With a turntable its almost like looking at a mirror looking at a mirror looking at a mirror ... it picks up the vibration that it originally caused then amplifies it again ... If you like the result go with it. But I wouldn't call this "isolation." Now off on another tangent ... in a way he has done you a psycho acoustic favour. He has given you enough for your brain to believe that there is a sonic benefit to using wood. I actually think the brain is very very powerful in influencing our perception of what we hear. In this case, going with the maple is going to be cheap. It wouldn't surprise me if a thing like this is enough for your brain to create a sensation you perceive as more musical. Whether or not an actual objectively audible (ie in a blind AB comparison) difference is needed for this to work is another question. Quote:
Not really the solution for someone who wants to take it apart and tweak all the time. But then, having designed to allow for hiding cables doesn't mean you have to use the facility. The left column can carry power cable, interconnects on the right, and speaker cable hmmmmmmm ... undecided so far, don't really want a third column! Wow, can't believe I got into this kind of discussion over an audio rack *chuckles* ... what a bizarre hobby this is ...
__________________
AUDIO BLOG | Bass integration guide My work: www.redspade.com.au web design studio |
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: somewhere in California
|
Quote:
Quote:
Shouldn't a good rack design incorporate isolation from both outside sources and internally generated vibration? Then again, I know a guy who has a rack made entirely out of 3/8" thick plate steel. His "big thing" is electromagnetic isolation... Quote:
Maybe I'm overanalyzing this whole thing; or maybe, just like every other component of your system, a different rack design offers a different advantage. Quote:
Quote:
Actually, maple costs roughly twice as much as pine, it's a hardwood; denser than mahogany or oak(depending on what variety).
__________________
"This is just my 'one cent'; I haven't got two to give." |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shropshire, England
|
Quote:
Sorbothane is so-called for a good reason - it absorbs vibrational energy (more accurately, converts it to heat), as do all such resilient materials. I find it interesting that so many people recommend (correctly, IMHO) damping material on equipment cases, but also prefer 'open' shelves to closed housings. My gear fits snugly int 'cubbyholes', with high density foam linings - because it sounds better to me that way. Good results are claimed for the TNT racks - easy to build and 'dress up', simple to level, and inexpensive (depending on your chosen materials). |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Quote:
Now put a jack hammer onto the concrete and you will find out how much damping you get from the concrete. Now the force will either break up the concrete or transfer the vibrations through. Quote:
So what I'm saying is be aware of what you are aiming for and sure that what you are doing will actually achieve it. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
IMO spikes have no real acoustic function. They look good. They don't isolate anything or provide damping (unless they have pads, but then its the pad and not the spike). I have spikes (cones actually) because they look good, that's all. They could make things worse. On a timber floor they could couple the speakers to the floor. Say you have carpet, which will provide damping. Now what you do with speakers for example, is provide a more solid path for vibration to be coupled to the floor, so it will vibrate and act as a secondary transducer. This will colour the sound, and I suppose you could even call it distortion, although its not one normally measured, but its going to be audible. You may like it, you may not. Again I marvel at the scope of this discussion for something as "simple" as a rack!
__________________
AUDIO BLOG | Bass integration guide My work: www.redspade.com.au web design studio |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
The main reason why suspending or decoupling your turntable from the floor works so well is as Paul said: positive feedback from the speakers, through the floor and air into your turntable, and back to the stylus, colours the sound. In the worst case, at high volume levels, the feedback will be so bad that howling is set up. Try turning the turntable off, rest the stylus on the record, turn the volume up, and give the record a slight tap, to see what feedback causes. That’s why a number of turntable manufacturers back in the 1970’s, such as Linn, Thorens and AR had better sounding turntables than ones with no suspension, because their suspension cancelled out most of the vibration from the speakers getting back to the stylus of the turntable. Coupling your turntable back to the speakers by solid supports, whether they are spikes or not, is not good. The way to stop turntable motor vibration from getting back to the stylus is by having the tonearm and platter decoupled from the motor on their own floating base, by a suspension system, like Linn (Sondek) or other belt drive turntables often do; or decoupling the motor via rubber mountings, as Rega (Planar 3) and many other manufacturers, including many Japanese belt drives, used to do; or making the motor relatively vibrationless, as Rega (P3/5/7) do now, or as the Japanese (like Technics) do with their low (platter) speed, direct drive motors (e.g. Technics SL-1200). Manufacturers also often make their more expensive turntables from materials which don’t resonate much, which is why acrylic and glass platters are often used these days, and acrylic plinths, and combinations of plinth materials.
The reason why maple may be used for instruments like violins could be because it resonates well, in which case it may not necessarily be the best material for a hi-fi rack. My expertise isn’t music, but I have a brother who plays the violin in an orchestra, as well as collecting and repairing them, so I’ll ask him when I see him at Christmas, if I remember. In fact, I did a quick search on violin making, and the first one I came to, http://www.centrum.is/hansi/construction.html , mentioned that the front and back of the violin have to be very thin, and resonate very well! So I certainly wouldn’t pay too much attention to what the chap from Mapleshaderecords says. It sounds as if he likes the colouration that resonating woods like maple introduce. His rubbish about how if you don’t have his miraculous speaker cables, your $2000 speakers can sound like $100 ones is just that – rubbish which is designed to part wealthy, gullible people from their money. They may very well make your speakers sound better, but the difference wouldn’t be equivalent to spending $1900 more on your speakers, as he seems to imply! No doubt if he gave the cables to a hi-fi reviewer and promised to advertise with them, they’d say how much different they make speakers sound, but then they’re hardly impartial, are they? He also says that long speaker cables are better than short ones. Obviously the electrical engineering that I was taught about making wires as short as possible to minimise resistance was wrong! And directional wires?? Obviously they wouldn’t be any good at passing AC signals then – maybe they’re for DC power supplies? Don’t waste your time looking at his site. It looks to me as though he’s got little in the way of engineering knowledge, so he resorts to making things up to try and sound knowledgeable. His website is a combination of truths, half-truths, sheer rubbish, and advertising. Sometimes all in the one sentence! It would be funny if it wasn’t so misleading to hi-fi buffs who have little engineering knowledge. Alright, I’ve had my rant and I feel better – now back to practicalities. Many hi-fi rack manufacturers isolate their racks by sitting the shelves on vibration isolating pads, such as rubber, foam or other materials. It helps to also have a relatively non-resonant material to make it out of – many make them out of glass, which resonates at a quite high frequency, or out of MDF, which is less resonant than most natural wood. That’s why virtually all speaker manufacturers make speakers out of MDF or similar materials. The MDF is less resonant because it is wood that’s been broken up into very small woodchips, then glued and compressed back together, rather than having a nice naturally resonant grain running through it, like maple, oak, eucalypt or any other tree wood! Whether it makes much difference to an amplifier is debatable, but under an electro-mechanical turntable, non-resonant and de-coupled from the environment is best. Resting your turntable on bubble wrap is probably good, if it’s several layers of bubble wrap. Using two bicycle tubes, inflated to a very low pressure, under a shelf resting on them, is another idea I’ve heard, and there is a commercial anti-vibration shelf using that idea being marketed, although it’d be cheaper to make your own. And dnsey, the reason why many people prefer open racks rather than closed racks is probably to provide good cooling for electronic equipment, particularly high power amps, which get hot when working hard. It may make sense to keep sound waves away from things like turntables, but most electronic equipment is more reliable if it's kept relatively cool. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
*applause for mosfet!* ... some common sense! I agree. You said much of what I was thinking but managed (this time) to restrain myself from ranting about!
__________________
AUDIO BLOG | Bass integration guide My work: www.redspade.com.au web design studio |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| build a STEREO weathers fm cart! | licoricepizzas! | Analogue Source | 18 | 13th January 2009 12:23 AM |
| Stereo Build - Mikaels KT88 | matthew2456 | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 24th January 2007 04:56 PM |
| Do u suggest to build ur own stereo mixer? | Ze | Analogue Source | 2 | 9th May 2004 10:49 AM |
| A rack for stereo and TV.. | TroelsM | Everything Else | 0 | 27th May 2003 12:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.23821 seconds (68.19% PHP - 31.81% MySQL) with 11 queries |