Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Everything Else
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools......

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th October 2005, 02:00 PM   #1
macboy is offline macboy  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Default Nomination for Stupidest Lamest Audio Product, SLAP (TM)

I nominate Creative to receive a SLAP(TM), the award for designing and marketting the Stupidest Lamest Audio Product.

Creative's "Home Theater Connect" is a product which lets you connect the 5.1 channel analog outputs of your computer's soundcard, to the digital input of your surround receiver. The box digitises the 6 channels, encodes them into DTS, and sends this to your receiver for decoding. With this box you can:
  1. Get an extra A/D -> D/A conversion
  2. Get an extra lossy compression cycle
  3. Do nothing you couldn't do with an analog connection to the receiver
  4. Use even more cables than before
  5. Avoid using the crappy DACs in your soundcard and analog connectio... wait, no, you still need all that.
  6. Spend extra money

Some favourite marketting-speak quoted from the website:

"Without DTS-610 connecting your PC to your home theater involves ... the chore of figuring out how to connect the multitude of cables to the back of your receiver."

Um, no comment. That's just too stupid.

"Play... DRM-protected content, such as ... DVD-Audio disks."

Excellent. I can use this prouct to re-digitise (at an inferior sampling rate) the DVD-A signal coming from my crappy soundcard DACs and send this noisy distorted mess to my receiver instead. I could have used the analog connections from my souncard to my receiver, or even the digital connection, and played the DVD-video portion of the disc, but this is so much better.


Any other nominations for companies deserving a SLAP(TM) for designing audio products for a non-extistant market, or otherwise being horribly stupid?
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2005, 02:38 PM   #2
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
 
Cal Weldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: British Columbia
Excellent example.

I'd like to nominate some of the people who buy $1000 plus audio cable. If ever there was a need for a slap...

Wait a minute. it's not the product's fault. It doesn't deserve the slap.

Cal
__________________
Next stop: Margaritaville
Some of Cal's stuff | Cal Weldon Consulting
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2005, 01:16 PM   #3
macboy is offline macboy  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Quote:
I'd like to nominate some of the people who buy $1000 plus audio cable. If ever there was a need for a slap...

Wait a minute. it's not the product's fault. It doesn't deserve the slap.
In my opinion, all makers of "directional" cables deserve to receive a SLAPTM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2005, 10:01 PM   #4
derf is offline derf  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
derf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Herts
Shakti Stones, C37.....

But as Cal said, it's the people who buy these products that need a slappin', not the product itself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2005, 11:24 PM   #5
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
ThorstenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
Default Re: Nomination for Stupidest Lamest Audio Product, SLAP (TM)

Konnichiwa,

Quote:
Originally posted by macboy
Any other nominations for companies deserving a SLAP(TM) for designing audio products for a non-extistant market, or otherwise being horribly stupid?
I nominate all companies who make speakers that cannot provide a reasonable reproduction in acostically small rooms, that is all making conventional HiFi Speakers that do not have a reasonably well controlled and even directivity from the lowest range all the way up. That is an awfull lot of companies BTW.

Sayonara
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2005, 11:44 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
The Peasant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sunny Alberta
http://www.gcaudio.com/cgi-bin/store...uct.cgi?id=190

From another current thread...
__________________
The Electronic Peasant
www.electronicpeasant.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2005, 04:25 AM   #7
Enzo is offline Enzo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lansing, Michigan
I apologize in advance, but after the Tice Clock, everything else seems tame.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2005, 09:00 AM   #8
derf is offline derf  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
derf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Herts
What's a Tice clock, link us up....

Quote:
I nominate all companies who make speakers that cannot provide a reasonable reproduction in acostically small rooms, that is all making conventional HiFi Speakers that do not have a reasonably well controlled and even directivity from the lowest range all the way up. That is an awfull lot of companies BTW.
Hey, no fair, that's like all speaker companies, isn't it?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2005, 09:26 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Portland,Oregon
Blog Entries: 4
Send a message via AIM to DigitalJunkie
Quote:
Originally posted by derf
What's a Tice clock, link us up....



Hey, no fair, that's like all speaker companies, isn't it?


And I thought bass was non-directional?


I dunno..I think my speakers sound darn good,Like a concert in my small bedroom.
But they weren't made by a company,just my Dad.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2005, 10:11 AM   #10
derf is offline derf  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
derf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Herts
Well, if you use some kind of dipole design, the output coming from the front of the driver meets the output coming from the rear at the edges of the baffle, and they cancel each other out to an extent.

How high they start canceling each other out depends on the size of the baffle.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This product may contain.... Spiny Everything Else 8 18th July 2009 01:16 AM
TI's audio product lineup advert wakibaki Solid State 0 21st April 2009 08:31 AM
Interesting product for PC audio. imperfectcircle Digital Source 4 2nd February 2007 04:31 AM
Need DIY Bass Guitar slap effect??Help!! thomgun_lc Instruments and Amps 24 25th July 2006 07:59 AM
Stupidest Question Ever.... elfman222 Chip Amps 10 1st December 2003 09:14 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 AM.

Page generated in 0.19661 seconds (48.84% PHP - 51.16% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio