Spam, Spam, Spam, Lawsuits and Spam....
All reading this, I well know that this post is totally off subject WRT to DiyAudio, but none the less I feel that this information should be known to everybody using the internet and e-mail.
I caught up with a local colleague (JM) over the phone today on some servicing technical matters and then had a yarn.
It turns out that JM is being sued by a SPAMMER for lost income !.
JM got sick of junk email posted to him, and said so in a discussion group.
An organisation called SPEWS found his complaint and made the spammers address available on a list for access by service providers for blocking purposes.
This spammer was duly denied service and lost income as a result and now is suing for AUS$45,000 !!!!.
The case has been to court so far with the the result decision reserved .
"Mr McNicol has previously alleged, outside court, that internet users would have to find an alternative to email if marketing companies got the green light to send junk emails. "
My understanding is that this is a landmark test case with long term ramifications, so if there are any suitably heeled, knowlegable or connected and concerned listening here please get in touch with Jo and give suitable help and assistance.
For general knowledge are these pages -
very interesting. I bookmarked the SREWS link. Me 2 is sick of junk email. :yuck:
About spam, what is the best advice besides changing email address:
I get porn spam, get rich spam, other sorts of spam. I don't dare the reply to them to stop because I believe things gets worse. Is the only advise to change email address?
The problem is not very big, 10-100 spam in a week. To this includes virus from M$ users.
BTW: I'm so glad I using Mac. Why? No viruses!! Yes this is true (more or less).>50000 on PC, <100 on Mac!
Step two, watch which newsgroups you post in, and which products you register online. If you must use an email address to register a product or gain access to a web site, use your "AOL" address.... ;)
Step three, as Peranders has pointed out - don't reply to any email, as it has been demostrated time and time again that replying only exacerbates the problem. :mad:
The lawsuit reminds me of the lady who sued (and won!) McDonalds because she burned herself on the :hot: coffee she spilled in her lap.... :sigh: But I won't go into that....
This problem was discussed on swedish TV news tonight
(incidentally shortly before Per-Anders posted his reply
(coincidence???)). Anyway, except for discussing the problem,
rudimentary methods to minimize it etc. they reported on a
british study finding that people in Britain spend about 10%
of their working time just deleting junk mail!!! This ought to
be enough for the big companies to exercise their power to
put pressure on, hm, well .... somebody.
One never stops getting amazed about what offers one gets.
In the early days of spam mail I estimated that some 10 - 20%
of the offers were to buy CDs with lists of email addresses,
obviously not useful for anything but sending spam. :sigh:
Or can anybody explain why I, being a male living
in Sweden, would be interested in consulting a gyneacologist
in washington DC:scratch:
One important thin when messing in the spam fighting is that you must be sure that you are targeting the right company or person.
It is possible for a spammer to change the header of an e-mail (if you want to see it their is an option for that in most mail program)
Also most ISP and E-amil provider have a form of batch send option on their server.
For example If one company want to make a newsletter but d'ont have the bandwidth to send all those e-mail he just need to post one e-mail with all the adresses and the mail server will rout them to every adresses.
Spammer use this to hide themselve behind major ISP company.
Thats not to tell that big company d'ont use spam it's just that you need to check before acting.
My spams started the moment I registered with Yahoo....... Now I'm getting around 30-40 spams per day.... Damn...
My snail mailbox doesn't collapse under the weight of junk mail only because of postage. Wouldn't it be great if we could figure out a way to charge spamers for bothering us? I propose 0.10 to deliver from any address I have not replied to. Deducted from my bill of course.:)
I was with a different ISP and getting 5 spams per day.
I changed provider and now I get none - for now.
30-40 emails would be a real PITA.
Jo told me this lawsuit is a worldwide first, and if this idiot spammer gets his way, that might be the future for all of us and nothing we will be able to do about it.
Maybe we should review the way e-mail system function.
|All times are GMT. The time now is 01:49 AM.|
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio