|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Netherlands (Friesland)
|
The other day i was demonstration (very effectivly) on a cheap hi-fi system that treble extension was needed for bass definition. If i wound the treble control right down, all the bass/precusion merged into a muddled mess. Extra treble gave the bass and precusion the impact and clarity that i like. The system was a marantz CD63 KI sig, hitachi 5300 70's amp and cheap jamo speakers.
Question: was my test flawed because the phase shift introduced by the treble control was also effecting the bass definition, rather than the lack of treble extension alone? Mark
__________________
We will pay the price, but we will not count the cost... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dr. Gedlee interview - bass extension | blue934 | Multi-Way | 36 | 9th November 2008 03:21 PM |
| Tannoy monitor bass extension | saramac | Multi-Way | 4 | 27th November 2006 02:06 PM |
| No bass / No Treble But Bass And treble Help! | jleaman | Analog Line Level | 11 | 29th October 2005 06:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06060 seconds (60.17% PHP - 39.83% MySQL) with 10 queries |