|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montreal
|
I took a few schemes, from a couple of places(4) and assembled them, but there are TONS of errors(from what people told).
Here's what have been told: 1. Ditch the LED bias scheme at the input. The input should be biased with an equal-value potential divider. As you have it the bias will be unsymmetrical and as battery voltage changes you will get level shifts. 2. The 100k after the 741 is doing nothing as the next stage is loading the filter more than the 100k ever will. 3. Q1 has no DC bias. Look in a text book to see how to bias transistors -- it's quite simple. 4. 1N4148 will be OK for D1 and D2. 5. LM386 has no DC bias when the switch is changing between the circuit and ext amp. This will cause massive clicks and pops. See answer to 3. 6. Your switch for clean/fx is in the wrong place as well. It should switch between those 2 pots. As you have it the output of the fx cct is being force-fed with the input. http://angelfire.com/ca7/hotcomcenter/
__________________
Antoine http://dmsaudio.ca/ |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Sorted!
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
[list=1][*]The LED biasing scheme is OK. It's a bit better than a voltage divider if the 9 volts com from a poorly filtered wall wart.[*]Yep, the 100K is unnecessary, but harmless.[*]Q1 is biased alright. Bias comes from the 100k resistor between Q1-s base and Q2-s emitter. It's quite simple.
What I would do is to increase the output cap to at least 1000µF. With only 220µF and an 8ohm loudspeaker you'll have a cut off frequency of about 90 Hz, which is a little high. With a 4ohm speaker it will definitely be inadequate. Rune
__________________
Do wizards use spell checkers? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montreal
|
Revised the circuit a bit, but I think I created more problems.
__________________
Antoine http://dmsaudio.ca/ |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Looks OK to me. What kind of problems do you think you've created? Maybe you should put a 100 k resistor from the switched end of the capacitor on the input of the FX circuit to ground. Otherwise you may get clicks when you switch on the FX circuit.
Rune
__________________
Do wizards use spell checkers? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Montreal
|
Don't know, when I change something in a scheme, it's generally worse.
__________________
Antoine http://dmsaudio.ca/ |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How is this possible? (A hi fi review. Review) | terry j | Multi-Way | 50 | 5th June 2008 11:46 PM |
| for review | markmelheim | Multi-Way | 2 | 16th May 2005 01:42 AM |
| And another review (X2.5) | Duck-Twacy | Pass Labs | 0 | 23rd November 2003 05:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08646 seconds (73.81% PHP - 26.19% MySQL) with 10 queries |