|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
The context is I am about to start building a tube preamp which I have all the major parts for, all that's left is designing the PS filter stage.
I want to keep cost as low as possible, so I was thinking of using CRCRC filtering to avoid buying big $$$ chokes. I got the most recent copy of PSU Designer II and started to simulate, just playing with values of C and verifying how best to stagger the values for C in order to minimize ripple. In playing around, I noticed that leaving everything else alone and just increasing the value for one C out of the three can sometimes increase the ripple. Why? I always thought ripple would monotonically decrease with increasing capacitance no matter what the configuration.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
It could be an induced self-resonance caused by the particular values selected. I could also not know too much about it.
Mostly this is a bump-post. I would have thought the same as you.
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
My vote is for resonance, although it shouldn't happen with a pure low pass filter system (no L). Might be the last C and the RL across it is acting as the excited element.
CRC for constant current loads is fine, use a moderate value for the first, enough to get maybe 5% ripple (for +300V, that'd be around 15V) then filter the rest with the second cap. This also assures a solid foothold for the circuits (one 100uF instead of a few feeble 10-20uF caps). I don't like squishy long chains of R and/or L, they have a habit of causing phase shift oscillators. Better to rule out that possibility right away, even if there's no actual chance of it happening (aka, good practice). Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Class D - LC output filter - C ripple current | Skeebopstop | Class D | 8 | 26th February 2009 05:08 AM |
| DPA Bigger Bit Dac | Gretsch6136 | Swap Meet | 1 | 1st April 2008 03:11 PM |
| Bigger is Better...as a 2-way? | Spasticteapot | Multi-Way | 0 | 24th November 2006 08:06 PM |
| Why STK is bigger than TDA..?! | Dj BASS AMP | Chip Amps | 2 | 25th July 2004 05:08 PM |
| Characters getting bigger and bigger | Elso Kwak | Everything Else | 11 | 31st May 2003 10:43 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07501 seconds (68.35% PHP - 31.65% MySQL) with 10 queries |