|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Hi all,
Here's a project I've been thinking about for some months. A basic drawing with some dimentions was laying on my desktop, untill I discovered the Povray software and and wanted to have a preview of my project. Here's the description: Every stage is made of a wood plate and a glass plate(you can use granite too!). They will certainly be deboupled with squash balls (not shown on the picture) Like TNT's Flexy Rack, the stages are fastened with threaded steel bars. I'll try to post a better picture, when I'll be able to render something more realistic. Any Povray experts here? www.povray.org if you're interested. Do you like it? Alex
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
That turned out really nice
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Thank you
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Any suggestion or recommendation?
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
I thought that you guys would give me some advice or some ideas...
![]() Is my project so perfect that there's nothing more to improve? I don't think so!
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ingolstadt Germany
|
Hi Bricolo,
looks are really nice but I wouldn´t use glass to put the equipment on. There´s almost no damping and many components tend to react to this (no I won´t say that they sound some way "glassy" )Maybe you could use macrolon or acrylic plates for this? William
__________________
een ooievaar is geen konijn want zijn oren zijn te klein! |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Capital City Area
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Quote:
Is granite better?
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Quote:
IME experience granite is as bad as it gets. Most stones have a strong intrinsic sound due to resonance, high mass and parallel sides. The only exception i can think of is slate but it also requires attention. Some people absolutely love the strong resonating bass which granite imposes upon everything so it's pterry much a question of taste. There is some truth in the claim that the best stand is shelfless as it deals well with air-borne vibrations but structural vibrations affect it as much as normal stands and you still need some way of isolating components. Without criticising your design it appears to provide good coupling between shelves and supporting pillars but minimal isolation. In this case you need to individually isolate each component which works but is quite painful to achieve. A simple, yet effective shelf design is a constrained layer sandwich, similar to Simposium. Central to this is polyethylene closed cell foam in the mid layer which behaves similarly to an air bladder. I use foam with 45kg/m3 which appears suitable for medium heavy loads. On both sides of the 15mm foam core i have layers of baltic birch/pvc and thin (1mm) alu. This platform provides very good isolation, comparable to an air bladder without the bladder annoyances. Combining materials with different density and resonances pretty much removes any audible signature. Even reducing the number of layers to three still provides most of the benefits. To use a constrained layer platform with a stand of your design you have to make sure that the vertical pillars are only bolted to the bottom layer of the platform, otherwise you'll lose most of the isolation. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Hi,
You're right, there's a strong coupling between the metal pillars and the wood shelves. But the wood and glass shelves are decoupled with squash balls. Isn't this ok? Bolting the shelves only under them would lead to a unstable rack, except if I strongly bold the top and bottom shelves at both sides. Your "sandwich" would replace the wood, wouldn't it? And what would you advice in place of the glass? Thanks Alex
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 2U rack mount aluminum project case | elementx | Swap Meet | 1 | 26th December 2006 04:14 AM |
| My new hi-fi rack | audioPT | Everything Else | 11 | 4th November 2004 09:46 AM |
| someone to rack a pre amp | JeffEH | Pass Labs | 2 | 16th June 2004 06:57 PM |
| DIY Audio Rack | Eccu | Everything Else | 1 | 29th July 2002 07:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.41180 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 10 queries |