|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
so, im always thinking of trying to get a great finished look that is easy and consistant finish method.
i did a factory tour of boulder amplifiers and they use a simple blasting method to finish their metal. the finish looks GREAT, is durable, doesnt need anodizing, and is easy to do. they have a full walk-in blasting chamber with a tow-behind compressor. obviously thats overkill. i was thinking of a small blasting chamber: http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=45411 or http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=38440 then add a compressor (or if you have one already), and it looks like some sort of dust collector or shop vac. a compressor and a shop vac/dust collector is standard fare for most of us. i dont have a compressor, but was looking for an excuse for one... is there something im missing? with some fine sand (cheap?), you could get a great finish on aluminum. just an idea, let me know whats wrong with it, or if anyone else has already done this! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denmark, Viborg
|
Well, to begin with the statement that a bead blasted surface is durable and don't need anodizing. That is just about as wrong as it could be. A bead blasted surface is about as fragile and prone to scratches as they come, so anodizing is obligatoric. Once anodized, it's ok.
The blaster uses glass beads, those are not cheap, not at all. The blasters that actually work are fairly expensive, like 2000 USD, since they have to have a component that seperates the broken beads from the good beads when reusing them. Besides that you need a fairly big compressor to supply a constant pressure, plus some pressure gauges which are not of the cheapest kind, again to get constant pressure. Ohh, and I almost forgot to mention that the compressed air have to be fairly clean, which is fairly hard to sort on small scale as well. I have been working with a number of different bead blasters, and my conclusion to that have been that only the best is good enough for making a decent looking aluminum surface. I have a 1000USD unit next door, but rarely use it, instead I travel a couple of hours to get to a good one. Besides all this, you will need to have one for aluminum and one for everything else, especially ferrous metals really messes up the surface of aluminum. My solution so far have been to have acces to a high quality unit, or simply pay my way out. The el cheapo solution causes too much trouble, and is not really cheap in the end anyway. Magura
__________________
Everything is possible....to do the impossible just takes a little while longer. www.class-a-labs.com |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pioneer sa 9800. blast from the past | burbeck | Solid State | 5 | 15th January 2008 02:03 PM |
| Separate chambers | pei | Multi-Way | 2 | 7th January 2007 04:02 PM |
| Escape from UK London Blast | chris ma | The Lounge | 2 | 8th July 2005 05:36 PM |
| Two woofers--two chambers | Mos Fetish | Multi-Way | 3 | 10th December 2003 06:12 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08102 seconds (65.32% PHP - 34.68% MySQL) with 10 queries |