|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Leopoldsburg - Belgium
|
Hi all,
At work I had a questions about these cables. How did they come to these values, why 75ohm and 50ohm and not for example 35 ? or 86 ? Thanks, Jim |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NE Ohio
|
It's been a while, but I remember 75 ohms as being very close to the radiation resistance of a half-wave dipole antenna, which is around 73 ohms. A 75 ohm cable provides a good match with such an antenna. The 50 ohm cable provides lower loss, or less attenuation per unit length. I seem to remember reading that 52 or maybe 53 ohms provides the lowest signal loss. The equations are quite involved. Now, I'm probably going to spend time searching for the details since you've got me wondering. Anyway, off the top of my head, that's what I remember. If I find more details, I'll post them. Best regards.
__________________
"We wish to reach the moon, not because it is easy, but because it is hard." John F. Kennedy, 1917-1963, US President |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Claude,
that is interesting. As I understand you say there is actually an optimal characteristic impedance higher than zero ohms that gives minimum attenaution. I am not good at transmission line theory, so forgive some possibly stupod questions. Would this optimum impedance be the same irrespective of the signal frequency? Would it depend on the relative ratios between R, L and C in the cable? I suppose it might be that L /C ratio can't be choosen arbitrarily, but I also suppose we could get the same impedance by for instance lowering L and C and increasing R. Would that make any change to the optimal Z value? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The reasons range from attenuation (power loss), to um... I forget. Well there are many good reasons and it's mathematical. I know I have a paper around here somewhere but can't find it amid all my other images.
John Stewart of rec.audio.tubes sent the scans FWIW.Tim
__________________
See my Electronics webpage -- the home of Vacuum Tube Drag Racing. The key to being a successful Audiophile: "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NE Ohio
|
Actually, I was kinda close, but not quite there. The 75 ohm cable offers the minimum attenuation (some references say it's 70 ohms, others say 77 ohms). A 30 ohm cable offers the greatest current density. The 50 ohm value is a compromise between the two. Also, in WW2, there were antennae having around 50 ohm radiation resistance, making 50 ohm cable a desirable match. Now, if I can only find that book of mine with the equations showing the math. I don't even remember which book has it. Best regards.
__________________
"We wish to reach the moon, not because it is easy, but because it is hard." John F. Kennedy, 1917-1963, US President |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Maybe slightly off-topic, but since it is an audio forum, what is
the (supposed) characteristic impedance of phono connectors? Since some people seem to think impedance matchin matters also for audio, it would seem sensible to use cables that match the connectors. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Sweden
|
The phono connector impedance is undefined and not a controlled parameter in production.
The characteristic impedance is of little importance at audio frequencies anyway, you have mismatches at the transmitting and receiving end so choosing a correct phono is rather meaningless. That said, it may be useful to terminate cables at high (>100kHz) frequencies to avoid eventual problems with reflections. Having a zobel network at both the amplifier output and speaker end makes sense.
__________________
Jan |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midland, Michigan
|
The following link answers the 50 ohm/75 ohm question.
http://www.rwonline.com/reference-ro..._1_nov_5.shtml Happy reading.
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
|
Quote:
many people claim different phono connectors sound different and cables sound different and some even use 50 Ohm termination it could perhaps matter, assuming this is not all just psychology. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Sweden
|
Useful reading:
http://bwcecom.belden.com/college/te.../ciocahalf.htm A 50 ohm coaxial cable has a characteristic impedance of thousands of ohms at 20 Hz If there are differencies between different phonos, I would say it's contact resistance, capacitance and dielectric properties that differs.
__________________
Jan |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone using microphone cable in making their phono cable? | rich121 | Analog Line Level | 8 | 10th September 2010 12:50 AM |
| cheap cat5e cable for speaker cable | fishline | Full Range | 6 | 19th May 2009 07:42 PM |
| New in package Component Video Cable and Toslink Cable for sale cheap | jainbaby | Swap Meet | 1 | 30th December 2007 05:18 PM |
| problems with speaker cable as power cable | pjpoes | Parts | 11 | 14th January 2007 08:24 PM |
| microphone cable vs coaxial cable | Leolabs | Parts | 4 | 31st August 2006 10:24 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13901 seconds (66.98% PHP - 33.02% MySQL) with 10 queries |