Shame about TechTalk at Parts-Express - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > General Interest > Everything Else
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools......

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th June 2016, 01:42 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Default Shame about TechTalk at Parts-Express

Seems that PE is censoring any competition in their forums. Too bad.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2016, 01:45 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
Jim the Oldbie's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2015
Do you mean discussion of competitors' products, or something else?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2016, 02:31 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
No mention of vendors, prices, links, DIY designs(if sold as kits)............of products not carried by PE. You can talk about specs, measurements, etc.........'cause it would be a "freedom of speech" violation.
Sad state of affairs for PE.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2016, 02:50 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
Doug Kim's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Do they specify TechTalk terms and conditions for not mentioning of vendors, prices, etc.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2016, 02:51 AM   #5
just another
diyAudio Moderator
wintermute's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
It's a private commercially run forum, there is no such thing as freedom of speech in that context.

Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2016, 03:21 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Paul Carmody certainly handled that with grace and tact, if not aplomb. His AlEx thread just happened to be the one that yada-yada-yada . . .

Funny thing was, his actual interest was in a knockoff guitar (as it turned out) rather than loudspeaker components, which others mentioned . . . and not so favorably.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2016, 04:08 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Those terms and conditions are unnecessarily strict and will keep users constantly on their toes.

This is strike two, coming only a couple months after strike one, the terrible implementation of the new forum software. They might not get a third strike, that forum might go the way of other late great forums that died.

Forums sell product, the more people you can get as members the better. This will curb participation.

Techtalk used to be one of the best places on the internet to learn passive crossover design, that's why I joined, and I even stuck around for a couple of years (until 2011 or 2012).

Hometheatershack has an even worse terms and conditions policy, overtly religious terms and insanely unnecessarily strict conditions. I would never participate there, although I did join just to download Room Eq Wizard. Their terms and conditions are so over the top I can't believe they've found any measure of success at all, and in fact they seem to be doing quite well. I boycott them on principle - I won't even read that forum unless I absolutely need to.

Techtalk (parts express) mods seem to be talking up their customer service, dedication and technical knowledge as an excuse for this change in terms. But the fact is that their tech support consists of (I presume by advice given) kids playing with WinISD, issues with the WT3 go back years (not to mention the fact that they had to change the name as it was a blatant rip off to steal business from Smith and Larson from people who didn't know the WT2 and WT3 came from different companies and the WT2 is a much better product) and the Dayton mic cal files had obvious issues for years that were completely ignored by PE staff despite several threads documenting the problem. And those issues are just the tip of the iceburg.

Creating virtual walls in the form of terms and conditions to hide the rest of the world from their forum members is an ill conceived idea that will no doubt backfire as their forum continues to decline in participation and active membership.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2016, 03:37 PM   #8
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
kevinkr's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
I wouldn't expect anything different from a forum expressly set up to further the business goals of the company hosting it. This is precisely why the existence of places like this is so important, and why I limit my presence to this and similar noncommercial forums..
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2016, 04:40 PM   #9
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
Ron E's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
Parts express has had some good people on it, a lot of very enthusiastic builders.
A tendency in the past to be welcoming and beginner friendly. Doesn't hold a candle to the diyaudio community in breadth and depth of interests.

PE inherited the members of the old Madisound forum when Mad changed its software. Maybe the members of PETT will move on as well.
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2016, 04:52 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
I've been happy to see posts by a number of core PE TT member on this forum. Personally I migrated away from PE TT to this forum because DIYaudio has a wider breadth and scope and seems to pull in more of a global audience.

I think that PE TT was originally intended to be a support forum for their products. It is run by PE and if they want to limit the content they should plainly state the rules for that. I don't see why they should not have the power to remove posts that they think are working against the success of their business. At the same time they should be prepared for the consequences of that kind of approach.
Visit my Audio Web Page <<--CLICK TO LEARN MORE-->> Get my LADSPA plugins
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parts Express done me right!!! mikejennens Everything Else 5 10th January 2011 08:29 AM
Parts Express Buyout woody Full Range 6 5th December 2009 07:49 PM
parts express ! onis_uk Multi-Way 9 7th August 2004 01:56 AM
Drooling at Parts Express Nappylady Multi-Way 5 27th February 2004 01:38 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:15 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2