|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Hi!
Does anybody have an idea of low noise and/or more fast replacement transistors for the above types? please mail to: konstantin.junold@web.de Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
k.junold,
I don´t have Douglas Self´s book with me now, but, you can find at Douglas Self´s site (www.dself.demon.co.uk) articles about power amps using japanese series of low power transistores with low noise and high Ft. (2SA970 etc.) regards |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
What are your application? Transistors don't have to have low noise. It depends where they are. Normally only the input transistors are important. BC546, 547 548 549 550 556 557 558 559 560 etc are normal and OK in most situations. BD135 136 137 138 139 140 don't have to have low noise in most situations.
The speed is also OK 100-300 Mhz for the BC types and aorund 100 MHz for the BD types.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
|
Hi P-A, nice, quick answer.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Very low noise transistors have drawbacks (not so fast, higher capacitances, not so high Hfe in some cases) so that means (as allways) that you must choose transistor type with taste. Each transistor must be chosen considering what it should do.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Netherlands
|
Besides that Per, ultra low noise only makes sense in low signal apps AND low source resistance. I.e. MM pre amps and even then … The BC446 – BC 560 small signal transistors can be considered low noise for nearly all audio apps.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
|
…and besides all that, the question was asked 3 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
|
No idea. It was high before you have answered?
As about the thread topic, since the question was what is lower noise replacement for BC547, the answer can be BC549/550 (549/550 are lower noise than 546/547/548). Pedja |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Anyway, just imagine the pure guy asking the original question:
Sitting in front of the PC, soldering iron switched on, desperately pressing 'refresh'. And no answer for three years. And to be not 100% off topic: 3 BC547 would have lower noise than one BC547, but you must have well matched devices to get fair current shating without further measures. Regards, Peter Jacobi
__________________
-- YMMV |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low noise transistor and noise figure | Real_Macgyver | Solid State | 26 | 31st January 2011 02:34 PM |
| Red LED noise. | GK | Solid State | 5 | 14th December 2006 04:12 AM |
| anyone tried this for low noise 5v? | mlloyd1 | Digital Source | 1 | 25th May 2006 01:06 PM |
| Hum and Noise with Ono | rsbay | Pass Labs | 0 | 26th February 2006 01:51 PM |
| Noise | Bukitoo | Analogue Source | 2 | 17th March 2004 03:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10084 seconds (82.34% PHP - 17.66% MySQL) with 10 queries |