I'm still learning and need a comment about this two type of "shunting"
which one is preferred ?
comment are welcome
I'll use it for motorcycle R/R
Regards
La Ode
which one is preferred ?
comment are welcome
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I'll use it for motorcycle R/R
Regards
La Ode
Thank's for your reply
I understand, this circuit is way to simple
but i just want to know about SHUNTING mode of SCR
Which one should be preferred,
SHUNTING all the excess Voltage from Alternator (AC) to Ground or to each Alternator
It would help understanding if you draw in the bridge diodes.
The second circuit is better if it works. It avoids passing the shunted current through two of the diodes in the bridge. However, the voltage needed to trigger the SCRs will be lower because the same two diodes are between the cathodes and ground. Consequently if the trigger circuit is correct for one version, it is not optimum for the other. They are not two designs, but rather one design and one clumsy adaptation. Which is the original? First is more obvious.
The first circuit will work into an open circuit, but I'm not sure about the second. If there is no current, then the trigger voltage seems indeterminate. However, since the machine cannot run without some current, presumably, that won't be an issue.
In the second case the trigger current passes through the stator. Leakage inductance might be a nuisance, as others suggest. Do alternators have caps built in to the stator?
Could be wrong
The second circuit is better if it works. It avoids passing the shunted current through two of the diodes in the bridge. However, the voltage needed to trigger the SCRs will be lower because the same two diodes are between the cathodes and ground. Consequently if the trigger circuit is correct for one version, it is not optimum for the other. They are not two designs, but rather one design and one clumsy adaptation. Which is the original? First is more obvious.
The first circuit will work into an open circuit, but I'm not sure about the second. If there is no current, then the trigger voltage seems indeterminate. However, since the machine cannot run without some current, presumably, that won't be an issue.
In the second case the trigger current passes through the stator. Leakage inductance might be a nuisance, as others suggest. Do alternators have caps built in to the stator?
Could be wrong
Elvee & PlasticIsGood
Thank's for reply
Yes, common R/R was made with the first one.
Ok, this is with Bridge Diode shows
First one is Commonly used at R/R
But i seen this variation, but i don't know yet it will work without problem or not
AFAIK Motorcycle alternator don't have caps
Thank's for reply
Yes, common R/R was made with the first one.
It would help understanding if you draw in the bridge diodes.
The second circuit is better if it works. It avoids passing the shunted current through two of the diodes in the bridge. However, the voltage needed to trigger the SCRs will be lower because the same two diodes are between the cathodes and ground. Consequently if the trigger circuit is correct for one version, it is not optimum for the other. They are not two designs, but rather one design and one clumsy adaptation. Which is the original? First is more obvious.
The first circuit will work into an open circuit, but I'm not sure about the second. If there is no current, then the trigger voltage seems indeterminate. However, since the machine cannot run without some current, presumably, that won't be an issue.
In the second case the trigger current passes through the stator. Leakage inductance might be a nuisance, as others suggest. Do alternators have caps built in to the stator?
Could be wrong
Ok, this is with Bridge Diode shows
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
First one is Commonly used at R/R
But i seen this variation, but i don't know yet it will work without problem or not
AFAIK Motorcycle alternator don't have caps
I hope the new drawing helps you to understand how current flows around the circuits.
Did the variation have a specific purpose?
The original circuit does the job, which is to keep the battery charged. The modifications, if they work, cannot keep the battery more charged, or change the maximum current available from the alternator. It's unlikely that the modified circuit would do its job more reliably, although it is possible that the circuit itself could be more durable. So what would "better" mean?
There is some possibility that it places less of a load on the engine in some circumstances. Are you going to be entering an endurance race? Do you mind if the bike blows up the day after?
A fire between your legs at 150kph on a busy road is really scary. Unless the modification has been proven, or you are prepared to do a lot of thorough testing and measuring, stick with the original version.
Did the variation have a specific purpose?
The original circuit does the job, which is to keep the battery charged. The modifications, if they work, cannot keep the battery more charged, or change the maximum current available from the alternator. It's unlikely that the modified circuit would do its job more reliably, although it is possible that the circuit itself could be more durable. So what would "better" mean?
There is some possibility that it places less of a load on the engine in some circumstances. Are you going to be entering an endurance race? Do you mind if the bike blows up the day after?
A fire between your legs at 150kph on a busy road is really scary. Unless the modification has been proven, or you are prepared to do a lot of thorough testing and measuring, stick with the original version.
Common faulty at R/R is Diode bridge (from alternaltor to ground) broken
SO MAYBE the second circuit will perform better for "lifetime"
Thank's for explanation
I'll go with first circuit then
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.