|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
|
Has anyone used this CAD program to draw loudspeaker plans? I'm looking for something simple to use as I don't have the time to learn anything complicated
Can anyone recommend anything else?http://www.dcad.com/ Doug |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
I've yet to try a Windoz-based program that doesn't feel clumsy -- even the Windows version of VectorWorks has a clumsy feel that must be inhereted from Windows, because despite being the same code-base as the Mac Version, just doesn't have the elegance. Speaker boxes are typically fairly simple drawings and this will probably do you fine -- at least the price is a bargain. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Koper
|
I use Autodesk's AutoCAD for Windows and I must say that this is a good and quite easy to lern CAD software.
Cheers
__________________
Some are born with more and some born with less so don't take for granted the life we've been blessed it's hard to understand thet we're only a guest and each one of us shall be put to life's test. |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
I always felt AutoCad was a good example of how not to write an easy to use piece of software. In this neck of the woods it is considered one of the biggest detriments to the industry... one of those "i use AutoCad because everyone else does" kind things. It is capable but far from great, very expensive (ie VectorWorks -- which is just as capable as AutoCAD, if not more so -- and the machine to run it on can cost less than a legal copy of autocad), and, relatively, is hard to learn. Besides having used it myself, i have large number of clients who do CAD (largely architectural). You will see a new CAD person come in who has only used AutoCAD. For the 1st while they will complain (because the UI is different) but invariably after 3-6 months they will say "how did i ever live with that c%^*" dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Koper
|
I don't know. My opinion is that AutoCAD has it's oun philosophy of work which you must understand. I don't tell that is the best CAD software but is quiet powerfool for 2D drowings. For 3D drowings I use PRO ENGENEER or Autodesk's MECHANICAL DESKTOP. Now I intend to learn to make CAD with CATIA.
I have been using AutoCAD since their 9 th version. Versions 9-12 were MS-DOS software, 12 and up are Windows software. Now I'm working on 2002 version. Cheers
__________________
Some are born with more and some born with less so don't take for granted the life we've been blessed it's hard to understand thet we're only a guest and each one of us shall be put to life's test. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto
|
For anything 2d i allways use Autocad 2002, I have used other programs like pro E, Solid works, Solid edge, and other cheap cad software, but i find auto cad the easiest to work with.
I admit it might be harder to learn than other programs but for me it is the easiest to pound out quick 2d drawings. That said , i will never used autocad for 3d drawing. I have access to Unigraphics, so the choice is an easy one. UG is phenominal compared to any other cad program i have ever used, it's just damn expensive. |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Schwyz
|
Quote:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qcad/ http://www.ribbonsoft.com/qcad_downloads.html .... and here is an example (PDF, 350 KB) : http://home.tiscalinet.ch/cooltune/P...VMenhir1aD.pdf advance |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Schwyz
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
|
Rhinoceros with the Flamingo and Penguin plugins.
Pros: Super fast native render, ultra intuitive GUI every conceivable import/export filter for CAD/CAM, cheap compared to AutoCad, Flamingo renderer is ultra-realistic, Penguin non-realistic renderer is the coolest (have to see to understand) Cons: No parametric history, limited dimensioning, no hatching for 2D drawings, and starts at US$895 www.rhino3d.com www.flamingo3d.com www.penguin3d.com www.bongo3d.com Rhino is impressive, Flamingo is pretty good, but Penguin is the coolest thing I've ever seen. We us it to render sketches or "artist's conceptions" so that clients think something is still at the development stage. Gives a little leeway for design changes for ease of use and manufacture. Plus it makes great cartoons. I can barely wait for the Bongo to come out of beta. :)ensen
__________________
Those who claim to be making history are often the same ones repeating it. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My first GC PCB drawing... | flying | Chip Amps | 8 | 14th January 2005 06:24 AM |
| Drawing PCB's... | eeka chu | Digital Source | 4 | 7th June 2004 07:13 AM |
| Drawing schematics? | Johan_Ch | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 30th June 2003 10:39 AM |
| Schematic drawing | vacuumhead | Everything Else | 6 | 29th March 2003 06:33 PM |
| Ariel 6 drawing | kid | Multi-Way | 8 | 1st May 2002 02:30 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09635210 seconds (79.55% PHP - 20.45% MySQL) with 10 queries |