|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Everything Else Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc) BUT remember- we have many new forums where your thread may now fit! .... Parts, Equipment & Tools, Construction Tips, Software Tools...... |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
I need to design a device with a microphone in a very small (2"x2"x2") enclosure. My problem is, whatever I do, I seem to be over modulating the microphone. I checked SPL with a CheckMate SPL meter, and both A and C weighted give me SPLs in the low 120s.
I've tried many variations on placing the microphone (put it inside tubes, shielded it with baffles and membranes, put it in a separate chamber), and I've tried about 6 different microphones (all condenser), and several headroom circuits, including a 4 wire mic and headroom circuit that is suppose to be good to 136db, but it still sounds like I'm over modulating - slamming the mic membrane to the wall. If I open the enclosure, the microphones all sound fine. Any suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Have you tried sound insulation material or lining inside your enclosure? E
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
I did try stuffing the whole space with some foam, but it wasn't acoustical foam - it didn't make any noticeable change.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lansing, Michigan
|
So then just what is doing the driving? In a sealed box, what was sound waves can become pressurization.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
I have the enclosure vented with an open 1/2 diameter hole, so it isn't pressurizing. I would try to put some kind of acoustical dampening material in there, if I knew what to use. I was looking around for some cork, but being I filled the whole thing with open cell foam (the regular packing foam/sponge - polyethylene or polyurethane?) I'm not sure that is the problem. I am reading about room acoustics - anyone know what happens when you shrink a room to 2" x2" x 2"?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Antonio TX
|
When I first read the original post, I thought of "echo chamber." Maybe a pic or a little more info will stimulate some solutions.
__________________
It is error only, and not truth, that shrinks from enquiry. - Thomas Paine |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
I have trouble drawing this - but - Take a paper cup (coffee cup), poke or cut a hole in it big enough to stick your finger through, hold it up to cover your mouth and chin, and talk into it. I want to stick a microphone in the cup, and record it.
When I try this - I get what sounds like totally over modulated recording. If I pull the cup away from my face 1/2 inch or so, the recording sounds fine. I need the recording to sound good with the cup sealed against the users face. I think I've seen this type of a setup in a courtroom - I think there was a "court reporter" that was speaking into a cup - I couldn't hear her, but I think that what she was doing. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Small electrets are going to have issues with SPL's more than ~110dB. 1/2" or 1" electrets might work better. Radio shack sells a cheap omni dynamic microphone that might also work fine for this. Even a headphone element might work well as a microphone in this situation.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
Thanks Ron. I don't suppose the microphone manufacturers rate their mics on what SPL they handle, especially the cheap ones. Is there anything to look for that may reveal a higher SPL capability?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
I just ordered a Sure SM58 microphone and I'll test this. It is a dynamic cardioid microphone. I also got a pop filter - a double screen that stops the direct air strikes on the microphone. I'll post how this works in my enclosure.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sub in a small enclosure | Edmunds | Subwoofers | 18 | 30th October 2010 01:44 PM |
| small microphone amp | laki101 | Chip Amps | 6 | 20th August 2010 01:33 PM |
| Small Enclosure Woofer | h_andree | Multi-Way | 5 | 28th March 2008 09:25 AM |
| Small sealed enclosure | Ddeele | Subwoofers | 15 | 20th January 2005 08:50 AM |
| Microphone Feedback Problem | JojoD818 | Analogue Source | 2 | 1st July 2003 04:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09944 seconds (75.89% PHP - 24.11% MySQL) with 10 queries |